• Home
  • Backbase vs. Drupal

Backbase vs Drupal comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Backbase Logo

Backbase

804 views|493 comparisons
Drupal Logo

Drupal

Read 37 Drupal reviews
1,757 views|1,233 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Use Backbase?
Anonymous User
Being free to extend or alter it is important for us.
It gives the company the ability to quickly spin up ideas, and the scalability to take them further if required.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I would like to see better pricing."

    • More Drupal Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Jive vs Sharepoint vs Drupal Commons
    At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a round-up of a couple of the more well known platforms and compare their products to Drupal. In this roundup we will be comparing Jive, Sharepoint and Drupal Commons. Drupal Commons is a popular distribution created by Acquia to compete with some of these other proprietary platforms. There are many other options out there, commercial and otherwise, to compare with Drupal but I want to focus on Jive and Sharepoint for a couple of reasons. I chose Jive because it is one of the leading competitors in this space in respect to market share. Next, I chose Sharepoint because I have some history with Sharepoint. This experience dates back to when I built www.adhe.edu with Sharepoint 2007 a few years ago. I subsequently wrote this blog entry about my experience shortly after joining Mediacurrent. This roundup will also act as a refresher for those who read my original “Drupal vs. Sharepoint” blog. Yammer, which was recently bought by Microsoft and is the tool we currently use for office communication will also get some mentions throughout this article. As I went through and tested each of these tools I used three main criteria in my evaluation Cost Ability to Customize Overall features… Read more →
    Ranking
    4th
    out of 19 in Digital Banking Engagement Platforms
    Views
    804
    Comparisons
    493
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    5th
    out of 48 in Web Content Management
    Views
    1,757
    Comparisons
    1,233
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Temenos Infinity logo
    Temenos Infinity vs. Backbase
    Compared 46% of the time.
    EdgeVerve Finacle logo
    EdgeVerve Finacle vs. Backbase
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Finastra logo
    Finastra vs. Backbase
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Sopra Banking Platform logo
    Sopra Banking Platform vs. Backbase
    Compared 10% of the time.
    More Backbase Competitors   →
    SharePoint logo
    SharePoint vs. Drupal
    Compared 16% of the time.
    WordPress logo
    WordPress vs. Drupal
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Adobe Experience Manager logo
    Adobe Experience Manager vs. Drupal
    Compared 11% of the time.
    Magnolia CMS logo
    Magnolia CMS vs. Drupal
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Atlassian Confluence logo
    Atlassian Confluence vs. Drupal
    Compared 7% of the time.
    More Drupal Competitors   →
    Also Known As
    Portal Suite
    Learn More
    Backbase
    Drupal
    Overview

    People expect flawless digital journeys - provide that, or your customers will just leave. But with the Backbase platform, your bank can surpass expectations and become a beloved part of people’s daily lives.

    Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications
    Sample Customers
    ABN AMRO, Barclays, CheBanca!, Sberbank, Fidelity, Hiscox, Legal & General, Bank Hapoalim, PZU, Postfinance and Al Rajhi Bank
    BMJ, The Economist, New Republic, SpaceX, Lush, Danone, Tesla Motors, Peugeot, Stanford Law, Harvard, Oxford University, MIT Media Lab, The Beatles, MTV UK, The Weather Channel, NBC, BBC, grammy.com, Mus_e du Louvre, Whitehouse.gov, London.gov.uk, Gouvernment.fr, New Zealand Government, The Prince of Wales, British Council, NYC Metropolitan Transport Authority, Gatwick Obviously
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Retailer5%
    REVIEWERS
    Marketing Services Firm20%
    Media Company20%
    Non Profit20%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government17%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise55%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise28%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise64%

    Backbase is ranked 4th in Digital Banking Engagement Platforms while Drupal is ranked 5th in Web Content Management. Backbase is rated 0.0, while Drupal is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Drupal writes "Through my different companies, we have developed many Drupal sites, from simple ones to complex E-commerce sites and custom made applications. The UI could be improved, though". Backbase is most compared with Temenos Infinity, EdgeVerve Finacle, Finastra, Sopra Banking Platform and Liferay Digital Experience Platform, whereas Drupal is most compared with SharePoint, WordPress, Adobe Experience Manager, Magnolia CMS and Atlassian Confluence.

    We monitor all Digital Banking Engagement Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.