Banyan vs Safe-T Secure Application Access comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Banyan and Safe-T Secure Application Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tailscale, Twingate, Perimeter 81 and others in ZTNA.
To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
18th
out of 34 in ZTNA
Views
82
Comparisons
50
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
20th
out of 34 in ZTNA
Views
45
Comparisons
34
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
ZTNA
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tailscale, Twingate, Perimeter 81 and others in ZTNA. Updated: April 2024.
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Safe-T SDA, Safe-T, Safe-T Software-Defined Access
Learn More
Overview

Traditional secure remote access solutions like VPNs don’t work anymore for today’s world where users, devices, and applications are highly distributed and dynamic. We need three foundational building blocks to provide a complete solution:

1. Quantified Trust: User and device trust are no longer black or white, but rather like shades of grey where depending on the security posture the same user and device may be allowed different levels of access.

2. Continuous Authorization: The channel cannot be validated with just one-time authorization, but rather needs to be continuous authorized based on zero day attacks, unauthorized user activity.

3. Decentralized Enforcement: The access enforcement cannot be centralized to handle the large scale and security concerns of modern enterprises. We need a highly distributed architecture that scales with applications and clouds.



Safe-T is a provider of Zero Trust Access solutions which mitigate attacks on enterprises’ business-critical services and sensitive data, while ensuring uninterrupted business continuity. 

Safe-T’s cloud and on-premises solutions ensure that an organization’s access use cases, whether into the organization or from the organization out to the internet, are secured according to the “validate first, access later” philosophy of Zero Trust. 

This means that no one is trusted by default from inside or outside the network, and verification is required from everyone trying to gain access to resources on the network or in the cloud. 

Safe-T’s wide range of access solutions reduce organizations’ attack surface and improve their ability to defend against modern cyberthreats. As an additional layer of security, our integrated business-grade global proxy solution cloud service enables smooth and efficient traffic flow, interruption-free service, unlimited concurrent connections, instant scaling and simple integration with our services. 

With Safe-T’s patented reverse-access technology and proprietary routing technology, organizations of all size and type can secure their data, services and networks against internal and external threats. 

At Safe-T, we empower enterprises to safely migrate to the cloud and enable digital transformation.

Sample Customers
Redox, Byton, Veeva, BlueVoyant
Government of Israel, eviCore Healthcore, Glen Imaging, Sarin, LBG, Rollomatic, Boegli-Gravures SA, Banque Heritage, Groupe Minoteries, Temenos, ZEK, RLM Finsbury, Harel Insurance, Meitav Dash
Buyer's Guide
ZTNA
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tailscale, Twingate, Perimeter 81 and others in ZTNA. Updated: April 2024.
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Banyan is ranked 18th in ZTNA while Safe-T Secure Application Access is ranked 20th in ZTNA. Banyan is rated 0.0, while Safe-T Secure Application Access is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Safe-T Secure Application Access writes "The architecture is open to integration and development, making the product very flexible". Banyan is most compared with , whereas Safe-T Secure Application Access is most compared with .

See our list of best ZTNA vendors.

We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.