Banyan vs Systancia Gate comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Banyan Security Logo
82 views|50 comparisons
Systancia Logo
25 views|18 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Banyan and Systancia Gate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tailscale, Twingate, Perimeter 81 and others in ZTNA.
To learn more, read our detailed ZTNA Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
18th
out of 34 in ZTNA
Views
82
Comparisons
50
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
25th
out of 34 in ZTNA
Views
25
Comparisons
18
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
ZTNA
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tailscale, Twingate, Perimeter 81 and others in ZTNA. Updated: April 2024.
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Systancia IPdiva Secure
Learn More
Overview

Traditional secure remote access solutions like VPNs don’t work anymore for today’s world where users, devices, and applications are highly distributed and dynamic. We need three foundational building blocks to provide a complete solution:

1. Quantified Trust: User and device trust are no longer black or white, but rather like shades of grey where depending on the security posture the same user and device may be allowed different levels of access.

2. Continuous Authorization: The channel cannot be validated with just one-time authorization, but rather needs to be continuous authorized based on zero day attacks, unauthorized user activity.

3. Decentralized Enforcement: The access enforcement cannot be centralized to handle the large scale and security concerns of modern enterprises. We need a highly distributed architecture that scales with applications and clouds.

Systancia Gate, formerly IPdiva Secure, is a cybersecurity solution which provides ultra-secured access to corporate resources and applications for any type of remote user (roaming users, teleworkers, third party service providers, etc.). It is the only solution in the market awarded at the so-called “Elementary-Qualification” level by the ANSSI (French National Cybersecurity Agency) in the identification, authentication and access control segment. With a unique access architecture not needing an open port to the IT system, Systancia Gate is mostly used by enterprises and service providers for a secure extranet access to corporate managed applications.

Sample Customers
Redox, Byton, Veeva, BlueVoyant
Beaumanoir Group, Gelmalto, Wurth or University Hospital in Bordeaux, Botanic, Cassidian Cyber Security, CAT Group, University Hospital in Nantes, Grosfillex, Labeyrie, L’occitane, Gagneraud Construction, University Hospital in Caen, Picoty...
Buyer's Guide
ZTNA
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tailscale, Twingate, Perimeter 81 and others in ZTNA. Updated: April 2024.
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Banyan is ranked 18th in ZTNA while Systancia Gate is ranked 25th in ZTNA. Banyan is rated 0.0, while Systancia Gate is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Banyan is most compared with , whereas Systancia Gate is most compared with .

See our list of best ZTNA vendors.

We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.