Compare Banyan vs. Waverley Labs Open Source Software Defined Perimeter

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
out of 12 in ZTNA
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Popular Comparisons
Banyan Security
Waverley Labs
Video Not Available

Traditional secure remote access solutions like VPNs don’t work anymore for today’s world where users, devices, and applications are highly distributed and dynamic. We need three foundational building blocks to provide a complete solution:

1. Quantified Trust: User and device trust are no longer black or white, but rather like shades of grey where depending on the security posture the same user and device may be allowed different levels of access.

2. Continuous Authorization: The channel cannot be validated with just one-time authorization, but rather needs to be continuous authorized based on zero day attacks, unauthorized user activity.

3. Decentralized Enforcement: The access enforcement cannot be centralized to handle the large scale and security concerns of modern enterprises. We need a highly distributed architecture that scales with applications and clouds.

SDP – provides knowledge of who connected, from where, to what, when etc. in real-time and with far fewer resources than SEIMs require.

Learn more about Banyan
Learn more about Waverley Labs Open Source Software Defined Perimeter
Sample Customers
Redox, Byton, Veeva, BlueVoyantManTech International Corporation
Banyan is ranked unranked in ZTNA while Waverley Labs Open Source Software Defined Perimeter is ranked 5th in ZTNA. Banyan is rated 0.0, while Waverley Labs Open Source Software Defined Perimeter is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Banyan is most compared with , whereas Waverley Labs Open Source Software Defined Perimeter is most compared with DeepCloud SDP and Verizon Software Defined Perimeter.

See our list of best ZTNA vendors.

We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.