Barracuda Load Balancer ADC vs Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Barracuda Load Balancer ADC and Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
AnisKazi
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The price is very good, and it's not very expensive.""Barracuda's technical support is good - whenever we have an issue, they immediately connect and resolve it."

More Barracuda Load Balancer ADC Pros →

"We use the HDX protocol, a high-performing component of the Citrix solutions. We also use provisioning to generate VM and NetScaler ADC solutions to propose access to applications for our customers."

More Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management Pros →

Cons
"The quality of the solution's performance could be improved.""Load Balancer ADC is competitively priced, but it's not feature-rich, and its technology is not that advanced."

More Barracuda Load Balancer ADC Cons →

"We discussed problems with the network products with the Indian teams. The support center for network products is located in India. There are language barriers and issues with the time difference, so we sometimes face restrictions when dealing with this team."

More Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Load Balancer ADC is cost-effective and is about half the price of F5."
  • More Barracuda Load Balancer ADC Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The price is very good, and it's not very expensive.
    Top Answer:The price of the solution is reasonable. It costs approximately 200 million. So the price is very good, and it's not very expensive, because it's just basic WAF, but the Load Balancer is good.
    Top Answer:The quality of the solution's performance could be improved. For example, the solution's performance is high because of CPU usage when the application is in refresh mode for more than 30 seconds… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    622
    Comparisons
    531
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    309
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    167
    Comparisons
    103
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Barracuda Load Balancer
    Citrix ITM
    Learn More
    Overview
    Barracuda Load Balancer is ideal for organizations looking for a high-performance, yet cost-effective application delivery and security solution. With the broadest range of hardware and virtual models, Barracuda Load Balancer provides maximum flexibility for organizations looking to build highly secure and scalable application infrastructure, whether it's deployed on-premises or in the cloud.

    With billions of real user measurements a day, from every corner of the internet, Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management monitors internet traffic issues in real time and automatically steers your traffic to avoid them.

    Whether you host your applications and content on premises, in the cloud or in content delivery networks (CDNs), Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management allows you to globally load balance all traffic, dynamically optimizing the user experience and lowering service costs. Citrix uses real-time machine learning to direct user requests to the most suitable content source.

    Sample Customers
    Fenwal Blood Technologies
    Dataport, Bet365, VFLI, Rhode & Schwartz
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Educational Organization9%
    Retailer7%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise47%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is ranked 14th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 3 reviews while Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management is ranked 19th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is rated 7.4, while Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Barracuda Load Balancer ADC writes "Cost-effective but lacking features and integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management writes "It's a robust and proven solution that we've been working with for many years". Barracuda Load Balancer ADC is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Fortinet FortiADC, Citrix NetScaler, Kemp LoadMaster and HAProxy, whereas Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management is most compared with Citrix NetScaler.

    See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.