• Home
  • BIO-key vs. In-Webo

BIO-key vs In-Webo comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BIO-key Logo
BIO-key
183 views|122 comparisons
In-Webo Logo
In-Webo
158 views|137 comparisons
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BIO-key and In-Webo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
33rd
out of 105 in Authentication Systems
Views
183
Comparisons
122
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
34th
out of 105 in Authentication Systems
Views
158
Comparisons
137
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
BIO-key
In-Webo
Video Not Available
Overview

BIO-key International, Inc. develops, was founded in 1993 and markets fingerprint biometric identification software and hardware. Our network security solutions were designed to identify individuals and verify, or confirm, before granting access, among other things, corporate resources, subscribed data and services, web portals, applications, physical locations or assets using fingerprint authentication. Additionally, BIO-key is proud to be Microsoft's hardware and software partner in creating affordable, high-quality USB Fingerprint scanner accessories for Windows Hello and Windows Hello for Business. Our 25-year track record in delivering transformational enterprise and OEM-embedded biometric solutions is testament to an unwavering commitment: “To empower organizations with strong and multi-factor authentication (MFA) to strengthen online security that is both scalable and cost-efficient, enabling them to achieve rapid time-to-value.

inWebo took a different approach that prevents all 3 common 'flaws' of software+SaaS MFA solutions. We built our authentication algorithms using dynamic and random device credentials. The verification algorithms run within certified HSMs (hardware-security modules) operated in our multi-datacenter infrastructure. From a security standpoint, our solution is equivalent if not better than those 10 years ago. Yet, it also enjoys the flexibility, scalability, and convenience of a software+SaaS solution.
Sample Customers
The World Bank, Virginia Tech University, Univerisity of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Union Pacific, St. Luke's Hospital, Singapore Police Force, Security State Bank, Omnicell, Mastercard, Lockheed Martin
Deloitte, Groupama, Carrefour, Renater, Accor, Samsung, Sodexo, Pixia, Affirm, Safran, Locarchives
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BIO-key is ranked 33rd in Authentication Systems while In-Webo is ranked 34th in Authentication Systems. BIO-key is rated 0.0, while In-Webo is rated 0.0. On the other hand, BIO-key is most compared with Fortinet FortiToken, whereas In-Webo is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.