Compare BIO-key vs. In-Webo
Ranking  | |
Views 35 Comparisons 29 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 189 Comparisons 160 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
 Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Ping Identity, Cisco and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: December 2020. 455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 43% of the time.  Compared 25% of the time. Compared 19% of the time.  Compared 14% of the time. | |
Learn | |
| BIO-key | In-Webo Video Not Available |
Overview | |
BIO-key International, Inc. develops, was founded in 1993 and markets fingerprint biometric identification software and hardware. Our network security solutions were designed to identify individuals and verify, or confirm, before granting access, among other things, corporate resources, subscribed data and services, web portals, applications, physical locations or assets using fingerprint authentication. Additionally, BIO-key is proud to be Microsoft's hardware and software partner in creating affordable, high-quality USB Fingerprint scanner accessories for Windows Hello and Windows Hello for Business. Our 25-year track record in delivering transformational enterprise and OEM-embedded biometric solutions is testament to an unwavering commitment: “To empower organizations with strong and multi-factor authentication (MFA) to strengthen online security that is both scalable and cost-efficient, enabling them to achieve rapid time-to-value. | inWebo took a different approach that prevents all 3 common 'flaws' of software+SaaS MFA solutions. We built our authentication algorithms using dynamic and random device credentials. The verification algorithms run within certified HSMs (hardware-security modules) operated in our multi-datacenter infrastructure. From a security standpoint, our solution is equivalent if not better than those 10 years ago. Yet, it also enjoys the flexibility, scalability, and convenience of a software+SaaS solution. |
Offer | |
Learn more about BIO-key | Learn more about In-Webo |
Sample Customers | |
| The World Bank, Virginia Tech University, Univerisity of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Union Pacific, St. Luke's Hospital, Singapore Police Force, Security State Bank, Omnicell, Mastercard, Lockheed Martin | Deloitte, Groupama, Carrefour, Renater, Accor, Samsung, Sodexo, Pixia, Affirm, Safran, Locarchives |
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Ping Identity, Cisco and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: December 2020.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
BIO-key is ranked 43rd in Authentication Systems while In-Webo is ranked 24th in Authentication Systems. BIO-key is rated 0.0, while In-Webo is rated 0.0. On the other hand, BIO-key is most compared with , whereas In-Webo is most compared with Duo Security, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Fortinet FortiToken and RSA Authentication Manager.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.