Birlasoft Testing Services vs ZenQ Performance Testing Services comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
Views
76
Comparisons
60
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
48
Comparisons
17
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
ZenQ
Video Not Available
Overview

Birlasoft combines the power of domain, enterprise and digital technologies to reimagine business processes for customers and their ecosystem. Its consultative and design thinking approach makes societies more productive by helping customers run businesses. As part of the multibillion dollar diversified The
CK Birla Group, Birlasoft with its 10,000 engineers, is committed to continuing our 158-year heritage of building sustainable communities.

As an ISO 27001:2013 certified, SOC II and HIPAA compliant organization, for over a decade, we have been helping clients across the globe release high-quality software products to the market on -time and within budgets.
With the state-of-the-art infrastructure in our Centers of Excellence, Test labs and continuous investment in building IPs/Accelerators, we deliver mission-critical testing solutions tailored to client’s business requirements with a dedicated team of over 400 skilled and experienced QA professionals in US and India

Birlasoft Testing Services is ranked 20th in Application Testing Services while ZenQ Performance Testing Services is ranked 38th in Application Testing Services. Birlasoft Testing Services is rated 0.0, while ZenQ Performance Testing Services is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Birlasoft Testing Services is most compared with , whereas ZenQ Performance Testing Services is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Testing Services vendors.

We monitor all Application Testing Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.