Compare Bitglass vs. Forcepoint CASB

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Umbrella Logo
41,912 views|33,079 comparisons
Bitglass Logo
2,442 views|1,604 comparisons
Forcepoint CASB Logo
2,248 views|1,975 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Netskope, Palo Alto Networks and others in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB). Updated: July 2021.
524,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable features are the protection against ransomware and phishing.""It will protect, give you more robustness, and faster responses, compared to any firewalls or any of the proxy web servers.""The most valuable feature for us is the DNS-based protection.""It analyzes the domain security helps us implement the securest policy.""The weekly reportings are great. The investigation is super and the application management is equally great.""It's very stable, reliable and does its job.""What we like most is security and how easy it is to integrate with other appliances.""Provides dependable DNS monitoring of external devices."

More Cisco Umbrella Pros »

"The solution is very good when it comes to securing us against data leakage, because of the other proxy. It also has API scanning or data at rest. It inspects data in motion, which is the proxy, and then it has the data at rest, which is the API scanning. We can inspect for anything we want: file fingerprinting, PHI-sensitive data, PCI-sensitive data. It does not matter. We can usually find it and block it in transit and do our remediation with it. It could either be block, encrypt, or allow and watermark the file to follow it and see where it goes. It allows for those different scenarios.""The core CASB solution is the most valuable part. It allows us to put policies in place around which devices can log into our cloud applications. We have a policy that states that only company devices can access these cloud applications.""The biggest thing that I like about this product is that it's easy to use and teach. When we have somebody new starting to work with the product, it's easy to teach them. It's also easy to use the product as it does so much.""We are able to verify what is getting saved out onto the cloud. It allows us to have some DLP rules, since we have to be HIPAA compliant. If some personal health information has been uploaded to Office 365, then we are able to detect that sort of thing and account for it. We have set up rules to prevent people from doing that.""The solution’s AJAX-VM provides constant reverse proxy uptime. It has been very positive for our security operations. When people are trying to access the SaaS solution, it protects us from downloading any of that data and experiencing any type of attacks""The initial setup was straightforward, which was a huge win. That mostly goes to the fact that they are agentless. We didn't have to sit there deploying thousands of agents and all the things that go along with that type of deployment. We were up and running very quickly."

More Bitglass Pros »

"Generally, most of our customers are happy with it though.""The most valuable aspect for us is the fact that the product seamlessly integrates with the Forcepoint DLP."

More Forcepoint CASB Pros »

Cons
"I would like to see a graphical representation of the entire network.""It would be useful if they had a malware protection engine running inside their own VM.""This solution does not give us full, 360-degree protection.""I would like to see integration with SecurNX in the future.""The reporting could be improved by way of the information that's displayed. For example, when you pull a report, it shows an internal employee going to many websites, but you can spin that right down by saying a lot of it is being cached.""It has happened in the past that Cisco Umbrella has denied us access to secure websites.""In the next release, I would like to see the integration of VDI NSX with Cisco Umbrella.""They need to improve analytics so they report on more of the specifics of user activity."

More Cisco Umbrella Cons »

"I wish they would advance more into the endpoint DLP solution. Currently they do not do anything around endpoint, they're still strictly cloud-based. The forward proxy is really the only thing they do. What I would like to see them do is to scan machines, workstations and servers, for information we might not want on those machines. That would be huge.""Their new SASE (secure access service edge) product would have been the one thing I would have requested. Now that they have that platform, I'd like to see it as integrated and seamless as possible with the core product. That's what they're working towards and that's where we're seeing the advancements.""Integration into different multi-factor authentication tools. On their page, they tout Duo, but I don't use Duo. I use another vendor. Not that they don't interact, but it takes a little bit more doing. Any amount of efficiencies here would help.""In our environment, when an Active Directory password changes, we tend to have some latency issues with access. It takes about 15 minutes before that password is accessible through Bitglass after the change. That would be the major thing I see as a negative.""Initially, we had some challenges that Bitglass resolved quickly. The challenges were around communication. There didn't seem like there was the right level of communication within the Bitglass organization. Once we brought the issues up at a higher level, then they were resolved."

More Bitglass Cons »

"Integration is an area of the solution that needs to be improved.""The solution needs to be easier to install, and they need to clean up the backend, so stuff doesn't break."

More Forcepoint CASB Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.""Cisco has a model called ELA. With ELA, if you buy the solution you will have the complete security portfolio and you can pay it yearly or after three years, it depends on the contract.""I am not sure, I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I think it's $1.00 or so per device/month.""Cisco uses subscription models for the pricing and there are three subscription plans.""The licensing part for Umbrella is really flexible.""There are three models for licensing with different feature sets.""I think it's worth the money.""The price of Cisco Umbrella is a little higher than similar solutions, like Gateway."

More Cisco Umbrella Pricing and Cost Advice »

"There is training involved. If you're going to add more people to it, such as cross train more of your group, there's a cost. Other than that, that's it. We have paid exactly what the invoices have said. We signed a three-year contract and not gone above it.""We have our pricing by user. We do our pricing agreements annually. There are also additional costs for maintenance.""Typically, the longer you price forward, the better off you're going to be. They have been very willing to work with us on pricing."

More Bitglass Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing really depends on the size of the customer's business because it is price-relevant to the environment."

More Forcepoint CASB Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) solutions are best for your needs.
524,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the ability to block users from reaching places that they should not even try to reach has… more »
Top Answer: When talking about Cisco solutions in general there pricing model is horrible. For example, you can sell a Meraki-based… more »
Top Answer: One of the issues with Umbrella is as you get into endpoint detection and response, such as EDR point solutions, some of… more »
Top Answer: The solution’s AJAX-VM provides constant reverse proxy uptime. It has been very positive for our security operations… more »
Top Answer: We have our pricing by user. We do our pricing agreements annually. There are also additional costs for maintenance.
Top Answer: They need to mature the SmartEdge Secure Web Gateway (SASE) solution. It is still very early as a product based on… more »
Top Answer: Generally, most of our customers are happy with it though.
Top Answer: The pricing really depends on the size of the customer's business because it is price-relevant to the environment. If… more »
Top Answer: Integration is an area of the solution that needs to be improved.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
OpenDNS
Bitglass Next-Gen CSG
Imperva Skyfence
Learn More
Overview

OpenDNS provides easy-to-implement Internet navigation and Web security solutions for families, schools, governmental organizations and businesses of all sizes. The services provided by OpenDNS increase the speed of navigating websites and prevent unintended access to phishing and malware sites as well as to any Web content that you configure to be restricted.   

The Bitglass OmniTM multi-protocol proxy architecture ensures that all data, whether accessed from a managed or unmanaged device, is subject to the visibility and control required by the organization, while simultaneously preserving employee privacy across personal applications. Omni Agentless, Bitglass’ reverse proxy capability, leverages patent pending AJAX-VM technology to ensure application resilience. Competitive CASBs either rely entirely on cumbersome agent-based forward proxy solutions, or suffer from breakages and downtime as cloud providers update and change their applications.

The Skyfence Cloud Gateway is a Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB) that provides visibility and control over sanctioned and unsanctioned cloud apps to enable their safe and productive use. Organizations can use this cloud security service to discover SaaS applications in use and assess related risks. They can also enforce controls to prevent account-centric threats, meet compliance requirements, and protect user accounts and data in the cloud. With Imperva Skyfence, users get the apps they want and IT gets the visibility and control they need

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Umbrella
Learn more about Bitglass
Learn more about Forcepoint CASB
Sample Customers
Chart Industries, City of Aspen, Eastern Mountain Sports, FLEXcon, George Washington University, Jackson Municipal Airport Authority, Ohio Public Library Information Network, PTC, Richland Community College, Smart Motors, Tulane University, VeriClaim
UNC-Charlotte
Zions Bank, GE Healthcare, HomeAway, Logitech, Universal, California National Resources Agency and many mor
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm16%
Consumer Goods Company9%
Comms Service Provider9%
Security Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider28%
Computer Software Company25%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company25%
Financial Services Firm25%
Non Profit13%
Insurance Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company56%
Comms Service Provider9%
Manufacturing Company4%
Retailer3%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider17%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Manufacturing Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise35%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business12%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise64%
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Large Enterprise75%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business70%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise18%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Netskope, Palo Alto Networks and others in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB). Updated: July 2021.
524,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Bitglass is ranked 5th in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) with 6 reviews while Forcepoint CASB is ranked 11th in Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) with 2 reviews. Bitglass is rated 8.6, while Forcepoint CASB is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Bitglass writes "Enabled us to go to the cloud while accounting for HIPAA and PCI compliance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Forcepoint CASB writes "Needs better backend code, requires stronger technical support, and the initial setup should be easier". Bitglass is most compared with Netskope CASB, Microsoft Cloud App Security, Zscaler Internet Access, Prisma SaaS by Palo Alto Networks and Fortinet FortiCASB, whereas Forcepoint CASB is most compared with Akamai Enterprise Application Access, Netskope CASB, Prisma SaaS by Palo Alto Networks, Microsoft Cloud App Security and Appgate SDP.

See our list of best Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.