BlackBerry Secure [EOL] vs Trellix Embedded Control comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BlackBerry Secure [EOL] and Trellix Embedded Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Forescout, Nozomi, Armis Security and others in IoT Security.
To learn more, read our detailed IoT Security Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Ranking
Unranked
In IoT Security
13th
out of 26 in IoT Security
Views
63
Comparisons
35
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
IoT Security
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Forescout, Nozomi, Armis Security and others in IoT Security. Updated: April 2024.
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
McAfee Embedded Control, Intel Security Controller, McAfee Controller
Learn More
Overview

BlackBerry Secure is a comprehensive, mobile-native approach to security that addresses the entire enterprise, from endpoint to endpoint. BlackBerry offers comprehensive, cloud-enabled software that helps companies manage and secure the Enterprise of Things.

Today’s expanding attack surface is dominated by non-traditional endpoints that range from wearable fitness devices to critical connected sensors that control generation and distribution. As the number of connected devices grows, so do the risks from malware and attacks. Trellix Embedded Control ensures the integrity of your systems by only allowing authorized access to devices and blocking unauthorized executables.

Trellix Embedded Control focuses on solving the problem of increased security risk arising from the adoption of commercial operating systems in embedded systems. Trellix Embedded Control is a small-footprint, low-overhead, application-independent solution that provides “deployand-forget” security. Trellix Embedded Control converts a system built on a commercial operating system into a “black box” so it looks like a closed proprietary operating system. It prevents any unauthorized program that is on disk or injected into memory from executing and prevents unauthorized changes to an authorized baseline. This solution enables manufacturers to enjoy the benefits of using a commercial operating system without incurring additional risk or losing control over how systems are used in the field.

Sample Customers
SIRVA, Buddle Findlay, Catholic Church Insurance and Macquarie University
Kleberg Bank, Sicredi, Seagate, Loop Technology, Vidant Health, Xcel Energy, Cook County, Berkshire Health Systems, Mauser, China Pacific Insurance, Cologne-Bonn Airport, Bank Central Asia, Boston Medical Center, Boston Scientific
Buyer's Guide
IoT Security
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Forescout, Nozomi, Armis Security and others in IoT Security. Updated: April 2024.
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BlackBerry Secure [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IoT Security while Trellix Embedded Control is ranked 13th in IoT Security. BlackBerry Secure [EOL] is rated 9.0, while Trellix Embedded Control is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of BlackBerry Secure [EOL] writes "It is flexible on the database and application side". On the other hand, BlackBerry Secure [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Trellix Embedded Control is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security and Nozomi Networks.

See our list of best IoT Security vendors.

We monitor all IoT Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.