• Home
  • BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL] vs. Cedexis Impact [EOL]

BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL] vs Cedexis Impact [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL] and Cedexis Impact [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Unranked
In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
BMC Boundary, TrueSight Pulse
Learn More
BMC
Citrix
Overview
TrueSight Pulse responds to fluid IT demands with SaaS-based monitoring for real-time visibility into web-scale application metrics helping DevOps teams detect and diagnose problems fast.
Cedexis Impact monitors resource performance and continuously correlate it to business KPIs. Impact helps you identify optimization opportunities that boost application performance, improve load times, and make your website or app indispensable. Impact features easy categorization and configuration management. Each Impact view can be easily filtered to expose the granular insights needed to identify optimization opportunities. Break down results by device type, geography, ISP, browser version, and other factors.
Sample Customers
BeenVerified CraftJack Expedia InterviewStream Jive Rackspace SriptRock
Accor, Arte, Bets.com, DailyMotion, France Televisions, Gilead, Kingsoft Le Parisien, L'Oreal, Mozilla, Netlog, Pacnet, Government of France, Sita, Tumblr, Wargaming,net
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Cedexis Impact [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Cedexis Impact [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Cedexis Impact [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.