• Home
  • BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL] vs. Nastel AutoPilot

BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL] vs Nastel AutoPilot comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BMC Logo

BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL]

views| comparisons
Nastel Technologies Logo

Nastel AutoPilot

Read 4 Nastel AutoPilot reviews
173 views|122 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL] and Nastel AutoPilot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL]?
Anonymous User
You can easily scale it for high message rates, but it's primarily a flow-monitoring tool rather than an APM.
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
79th
out of 111 in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
173
Comparisons
122
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
BMC Boundary, TrueSight Pulse
Learn More
BMC
Nastel Technologies
Overview
TrueSight Pulse responds to fluid IT demands with SaaS-based monitoring for real-time visibility into web-scale application metrics helping DevOps teams detect and diagnose problems fast.
Nastel AutoPilot is an Application Performance Monitoring solution. It's real-time monitoring and analysis reduces the frequency and duration of incidents, end-to-end from distributed to mainframe.
Sample Customers
BeenVerified CraftJack Expedia InterviewStream Jive Rackspace SriptRock
Banamex, Barclays Capital, Bank of Bermuda, California Commerce Bank, Calyon Corporate and Investment Bank, CGEY, Checkfree Corporation, CIBC, CitiCard, Citicorp, New York, Citigroup Inc., CME Group Inc., Credit Agricole Indosuez Luxembourg, Credit Suisse, CRIF, Deutsche Bundesbank, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, DTCC, FannieMae, Fidelity (FMR), First Citizens Bank & Trust, Fortis Investments, GE Money Americas, GE Money Bank, HP, HP/WestLB Systems, HSBC, HSH Nordbank, IG Index, i-bp Banque, Populaire, Interpay Nederland B.V., IZB - Informatikzentrum Bayern GmbH & Co., JP Morgan, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., MGIC (Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation) NYSE, OMGEO, People's Bank (Ct), Peoples United Bank, Phoenix Informatica Bancaria S.p.A., PinkRoccade, Santander Bank, SKOFIN, Sociale Verzekeringsbank, Thomson Financial, UBS, UMB Financial Corporation
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Nastel AutoPilot is ranked 79th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Nastel AutoPilot is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nastel AutoPilot writes "You can easily scale it for high message rates, but it's primarily a flow-monitoring tool rather than an APM". BMC TrueSight Pulse [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Nastel AutoPilot is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.