CA 2E vs IBM Rational Developer for z Systems comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA 2E and IBM Rational Developer for z Systems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, IBM, Broadcom and others in Mainframe Application Development.
To learn more, read our detailed Mainframe Application Development Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
65
Comparisons
14
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
632
Comparisons
427
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Mainframe Application Development
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, IBM, Broadcom and others in Mainframe Application Development. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
IBM RDz
Learn More
Overview

CA 2E can enable your development teams to design, generate, implement and maintain applications with greater efficiency and effectiveness than third-generation methods permit.
It is designed to simplify application development by incorporating development design models, native code generation and deployment facilities into a single development environment.

CA 2E enables your staff to create programs without extensive knowledge of technical specifications or programming languages. With the implementation of traditional and newer IBM® i-Series®-supported technologies, it helps your staff address key development trends like component-based architecture and data integration across systems and platforms.

IBM Rational Developer for z Systems is an integrated development tool that you can use to design, develop, deploy, and test mainframe software applications, Web, and composite applications. IBM Rational Developer for z Systems offers integration for a variety of source code management (SCM) tools in addition to providing a framework for creating your own SCM integration. It provides a common workbench and tools for the following: Development of COBOL, PL/I, C++, high-level assembler, Java and Web Services programs, Interactive access to z/OS systems, Support for IMS, CICS, Batch, USS, DB2 stored procedures, application servers and CICS and IMS application development for Web Services and SOA.
Sample Customers
Indian State, Sky, State of Oregon
Information Not Available
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm30%
Insurance Company14%
Government11%
Computer Software Company8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise82%
Buyer's Guide
Mainframe Application Development
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, IBM, Broadcom and others in Mainframe Application Development. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA 2E is ranked 11th in Mainframe Application Development while IBM Rational Developer for z Systems is ranked 2nd in Mainframe Application Development. CA 2E is rated 0.0, while IBM Rational Developer for z Systems is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CA 2E is most compared with , whereas IBM Rational Developer for z Systems is most compared with BMC Compuware Topaz Workbench, BMC Compuware Topaz Program Analysis and Gen.

See our list of best Mainframe Application Development vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Application Development reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.