CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] vs OpenText Network Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] and OpenText Network Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is the fault management monitoring.""The pricing is relatively low compared to other solutions in this area. I'd go so far as to say it's even significantly less than the competition."

More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Pros →

"When compared with SolarWinds, it is more user-friendly, and tasks can be completed more quickly.""Pushing the network configuration to bulk devices. This saves a considerable amount of time that the engineer spends in pushing the network configuration."

More OpenText Network Automation Pros →

Cons
"My biggest complaint about ADA is that you have to rely on dedicated appliances.""The user interface needs improvement."

More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Cons →

"Level one administration task can be defined in Micro Focus Network Automation but it could be more simplified.""Compatibility of the devices needs to be enhanced, as it seems to be limited."

More OpenText Network Automation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is an expensive solution and there is a single price to pay for licensing, with no options."
  • More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing is reasonable, but if you compare it with other network Operation Management tools that are available on the market, it's expensive."
  • More OpenText Network Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    12th
    out of 22 in Network Automation
    Views
    487
    Comparisons
    336
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA ADA, Application Delivery Analysis, NetQoS SuperAgent
    Micro Focus Network Automation, HPE Network Automation
    Learn More
    Overview

    CA Application Delivery Analysis provides end-to-end response time monitoring at multiple component levels, giving Network Administrators the ability to quickly identify performance bottlenecks and to identify root cause in minutes as opposed to hours or days, resulting in up to 80% improvement in IT productivity and reduced Mean Time To Repair (MTTR).

    OpenText Network Automation helps IT organizations drive efficiencies by automating time-consuming manual compliance and network configuration tasks for the complete operational lifecycle of network devices from provisioning to policy-based network configuration management, compliance policy enforcement and reporting, and security administration. OpenText Network Automation also helps increase network stability and uptime by preventing inconsistencies and misconfigurations often created by manual processes.  When combined with OpenText Network Node Manager i, it delivers a unique integrated solution that delivers network fault, availability, and performance integrated with change, network configuration, compliance, and automated diagnostics that operates from a shared network topology database.

    Sample Customers
    ERGO
    Tech Mahindra, Avea, China Merchants Bank, NNIT, Distinctive Software Solutions, Virgin Media, NEC Australia, Osiatis, Hostworks, Retegal, Allianz Shared Infrastructure Services SE (ASIC), State of Kansas Division of Information Services and Communications (DISC)
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Government13%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise73%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while OpenText Network Automation is ranked 12th in Network Automation. CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is rated 6.6, while OpenText Network Automation is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] writes "Impressive ability to show potential slow downs. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Network Automation writes "Helps the configuration backup be validated before and after any change in the network infrastructure". CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText Network Automation is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager, BackBox, NetBrain and BMC TrueSight Network Automation.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.