Compare CA Endevor Software Change Manager vs. Compuware ISPW

CA Endevor Software Change Manager is ranked 1st in Software Configuration Management with 18 reviews while Compuware ISPW is ranked 5th in Software Configuration Management with 3 reviews. CA Endevor Software Change Manager is rated 8.8, while Compuware ISPW is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of CA Endevor Software Change Manager writes "Streamlines automatic building from source code to executable, and effectively migrates executables through the software lifecycle". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Compuware ISPW writes "Does our CICS NEWCOPYs and Db2 binds, reducing operations and DBA workloads". CA Endevor Software Change Manager is most compared with Compuware ISPW, Serena ChangeMan ZMF and IBM Engineering Workflow Management, whereas Compuware ISPW is most compared with CA Endevor Software Change Manager, Serena ChangeMan ZMF and IBM Engineering Workflow Management. See our CA Endevor Software Change Manager vs. Compuware ISPW report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Endevor Software Change Manager vs. Compuware ISPW and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It puts all our source in one product. We know where to go to gather all our source code and which source is associated with which executable. It's a one-stop-shop, one place to go for everything.The developers can very easily see what has changed on a particular piece of source code or a program, and others can look at that as well so they can coordinate their changes. It makes it much easier to promote a piece of code up to production.We have been able to replicate entire SDLCs for new clients and have them loaded and ready to use Endevor in as little as one week. This was possible with the use of Endevor variables within the processors, so that a single processor was able to function for multiple systems across the entire SDLC.The approach of writing a single set of Endevor processors to work across multiple instances of the application (separate systems) made the processors fairly complex, but once you understand them, they are so powerful.Our automation, our development implementations are all automated, which is a huge amount of time savings.In the last year or so, we had a need to start using a CICS web services, and mesh them in with some distributed functions on an enterprise service bus. We put the web services into Endevor and we manage that way now.They've got plug-ins now to run it through Eclipse, they've got a lot of APIs, they handle UNIX files. I can't really think of any serious lack that they haven't addressed.It's very flexible. A new technology comes along, this can be multiplied to handle the new technology quite easily.

Read more »

The visual ability to see potential downstream impacts to changes being made assists our developers in understanding the impact associated with their change.It does our CICS NEWCOPYs and our Db2 binds for us, whereas before, that was a manual process. It takes a lot of the workload off of the operations folks and off the DBAs.We had parallel development before, but the way ISPW implements it is better. It has more control and oversight of the process, whereas before, it was like the Wild West. Everybody could have their own package with their own version of the component in it... ISPW is constantly aware of it. It notifies when someone else is using or has a different version of that component.

Read more »

Cons
One feature of Endevor is its Backout feature. If there is a problem, it can back out the executables. The only problem with that is that it will not back out the source in Endevor. For example, you can do a back out and it will back out the executable to the previous version, but it doesn't back out the source version in Endevor. It would make it much better if when you did a back out of Endevor, it would back out both the source and the executable and keep them in sync.Needs more audit capability when it comes to changes to settings that are made by administrators, as many of these are done through the panels and are therefore not logged as an action against a configuration item.Interfacing with some change control products that are not CA's, it's a little glitchy on the approvals of changes. It requires special needs for the users for approvals.There are a lot of screens in it. The process for moving out my other solutions, it could be more convenient. There are a lot of steps to go through and a lot of screens to go through to get it accomplished.They need to ditch the Eclipse plugin and just make the development environment for Z the standard Eclipse interface.​It is still kind of behind the times. It needs to catch up with all the millennials that want a distributed look and feel.​Learning the tool for the first time was extremely difficult, and it could be because of all the other processes we had around it. But knowing you can do these things in batch, you can do things in the foreground or online mode, and then these, you have to have a package for. There are these rules, and some of the concepts inside the tool are not clear, like what is the CCID? Why do I have to have one? What is that? And how is it used? As a developer, it's not important to me - I don't know what a CCID is, and I don't care - but apparently it's important to someone.Sometimes finding errors and output can be difficult because it spits out so many messages that it is hard to figure out which ones are the ones you need to look at and what flow did it actually take through the processor.

Read more »

Better discussions to identify inventory prior to the start of any migration would be helpful for potential clients that have applications with code that is not modified often.One thing I would really like to see some improvement on is the promotion diagnostic messages. It invokes utilities "under the covers" to copy components, and it does not echo back any of the error messages from those utilities.There are some features that are not well documented, so documentation could use a little help, on things like setting up deployment and which structures in the database correspond to which tables.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It's competitively priced and, as far as I know, it's just an enterprise license. We have found it is worth the money.It's worth the value. The pricing is fairly good, justifiable for the return on investment.Licensing is fairly simple, you don't need multiple licenses.Just make sure if you are going to license, ensure you license the right features.​

Read more »

I like the seat-based licensing much more than MSU-based licensing, and that the cost has been competitive.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.
378,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
2,217
Comparisons
875
Reviews
18
Average Words per Review
515
Avg. Rating
8.8
Views
1,184
Comparisons
527
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
726
Avg. Rating
8.7
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
Endevor Software Change Manager, CA Software Change Manager for Mainframe, CA Endevor SCM
Learn
CA (A Broadcom Company)
Compuware
Overview
CA Endevor Software Change Manager (CA Endevor SCM) is the most widely used change management software for the mainframe environment. It can automate your entire development process, adapting to your specific business requirements and helping ensure consistency and complete control. Integration with IBM Rational Developer for System z can improve productivity, accelerate time-to-delivery and ensure the auditability of all programmer activities. Eclipse-ready, CA Endevor SCM helps shorten the learning curve for application developers. It provides your team with business-driven, customizable lifecycle paths and automated version control to protect your software assets and help maintain application integrity.

A modern, end-to-end Agile source code management, release automation and deployment automation tool that enables mainframe application developers at all skill levels to fulfill business requirements, optimize code quality, and improve developer productivity through mainframe DevOps. With ISPW, developers can:

  • Easily perform concurrent development to support Agile Development practices
  • Leverage Jenkins plugins to manage code throughout the lifecycle
  • Use REST APIs to automatically connect mainframe applications into modern DevOps toolchains
  • Collaborate with other developers through features like alerts when another programmer has checked out code
  • See versions of a program at multiple points in the development cycle to prevent incorrect overlaying and ensure smooth code integration
  • Access an intuitive relationship visualization that guides users to failure points
Offer
Learn more about CA Endevor Software Change Manager
Learn more about Compuware ISPW
Sample Customers
Blue Hill Data Services Inc.
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm56%
Insurance Company15%
Healthcare Company9%
Comms Service Provider6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Insurance Company43%
Financial Services Firm30%
Software R&D Company16%
Healthcare Company3%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CA Endevor Software Change Manager vs. Compuware ISPW and other solutions. Updated: November 2019.
378,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Software Configuration Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email