Compare CA Mainframe Resource Intelligence vs. Tone Mainframe Management

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
14th
Views
27
Comparisons
9
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
12th
Views
45
Comparisons
21
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
OMC-FLASH JES Spool Viewing and Management, DYNA-STEP Dynamic STEPLIB and Library Management, STEPLIB-Rx TSOPLUS Replacement, OMC and OMC-PRINT, ACC and SyBridge
Learn More
Tone Software
Video Not Available
Overview

Digital enterprises are made not born. In this journey, business and IT leaders in mainframe organizations are looking to optimize their core infrastructure and transform—at the same time. Daunting? Perhaps. Achievable? Yes.

CA Mainframe Resource Intelligence is an assessment tool revealing the as-is state vs. desired outcomes for opex, security, process and performance.

Tone Software delivers strategic Mainframe Management software solutions that directly benefit IT management and support teams, and provide significant productivity and cost savings benefits to their overall organizations.

Offer
Learn more about CA Mainframe Resource Intelligence
Learn more about Tone Mainframe Management
Sample Customers
State of Oregon, Vodafone Turkey, Sky, Blue Hill
Citibank, Bank and Trust, Telecom Italia

CA Mainframe Resource Intelligence is ranked 14th in Mainframe Management while Tone Mainframe Management is ranked 12th in Mainframe Management. CA Mainframe Resource Intelligence is rated 0.0, while Tone Mainframe Management is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CA Mainframe Resource Intelligence is most compared with , whereas Tone Mainframe Management is most compared with .

See our list of best Mainframe Management vendors.

We monitor all Mainframe Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.