CA NetMaster File Transfer Management vs OpenText File Transfer Service [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA NetMaster File Transfer Management and OpenText File Transfer Service [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
40
Comparisons
24
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

CA NetMaster File Transfer Management enables you to be aware of the status of critical file transfers and allows for actions based on defined data center policies. If you do any kind of file transport, CA NetMaster can provide you with enhanced visibility of your scheduled and unscheduled file transfers.

FTS can be embedded and branded as an integrated service within a customer's own business applications and portals. Any file exchanged through FTS can be monitored through OpenText™ Active Documents for end-to-end information exchange visibility and monitoring.

Sample Customers
Hill International, SAIF, Travelport, Sky
Anglian Water
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is ranked 39th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while OpenText File Transfer Service [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT). CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is rated 0.0, while OpenText File Transfer Service [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is most compared with , whereas OpenText File Transfer Service [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.