• Home
  • CA NetMaster File Transfer Management vs. RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL]

CA NetMaster File Transfer Management vs RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA NetMaster File Transfer Management and RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use CA NetMaster File Transfer Management?
Anonymous User
We use it for on-premises hosting of web applications.
The deployment speed has been increased. We get accurate results when copying data.
Ranking
39th
out of 42 in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Views
39
Comparisons
23
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Broadcom
RepliWeb
Video Not Available
Overview

CA NetMaster File Transfer Management enables you to be aware of the status of critical file transfers and allows for actions based on defined data center policies. If you do any kind of file transport, CA NetMaster can provide you with enhanced visibility of your scheduled and unscheduled file transfers.

Attunity RepliWeb is a deployment platform for enterprise server, web operations, shared hosting and data center operations teams. It delivers quantifiable improvements to IT operations associated with deployments. Attunity RepliWeb offloads time-consuming manual tasks by automating processes, speeding release cycles and ensuring content and code continuity.
Sample Customers
Hill International, SAIF, Travelport, Sky
Wellcare, Couchsurfing, Etix, Colmobil, Tangerine, SM Retail Inc., GDF SUEZ, UnionBanCal Corporation, Pfizer, Software Box Limited (SBL), University of Maryland University College
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Progress Software, BMC, IBM and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is ranked 39th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT). CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is rated 0.0, while RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] writes "Website code can be done by application owners". CA NetMaster File Transfer Management is most compared with , whereas RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.