DX Virtual Network Assurance vs Midokura Comparison 2024

CA Virtual Network Assurance (CA VNA) closes the loop among traditional operational silos by bridging existing infrastructure management capabilities to meet the needs of software-defined networking (SDN) and network functions virtualization (NFV) network velocity, reducing the complexity in network visibility and planning while improving self_service and automation.

Midokura Enterprise MidoNet (MEM) Insights is a powerful data analytics and dynamic visualization solution that complements the network virtualization overlay from Midokura. Conventional tools offer zero visibility into virtualized networks and encapsulated traffic. MEM Insights empowers operators to make decisions based on data like never before. Easily view details about the virtual network, monitor traffic and tenant usage, and address security and compliance use cases. Unify your operations team with a consistent set of data about physical hosts and virtual network objects onto a single pane of glass.

Sample Customers

Cetip, Hill International, AusNet, TIM Brasil

Overstock.com

DX Virtual Network Assurance is ranked 4th in DX NetOps while Midokura is ranked 21st in Software Defined Networking (SDN). DX Virtual Network Assurance is rated 9.0, while Midokura is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of DX Virtual Network Assurance writes "VNA takes information from each of the different VNS vendors and feeds them up into the service assurance solution". On the other hand, DX Virtual Network Assurance is most compared with , whereas Midokura is most compared with .

We monitor all DX NetOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

DX Virtual Network Assurance vs Midokura comparison