We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The department management aspect of the solution is the most valuable aspect."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager (EPM) 's most valuable feature is its ability to manage user application privileges and protect against ransomware attacks by controlling access to specific files and applications."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"We were able to reduce the number of privileged accounts by 50%, which helped to simplify our privileged access management environment."
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager are password management, session management, onboarding rules, platform customization, and safety management."
"Users can scale the solution."
"The product is stable."
"The feature called PTA, which stands for Privileged Threat Analytics keeps track of what admins are doing and works with Centimeters. If something fishy is going on with a user's credentials, it alerts the security team so they can act fast. Plus, it automates stuff like resetting credentials or blocking users. So, if there's a potential hack, CyberArk can change passwords and lock out users in a snap. It also gives you a heads-up if anything unusual is going on with server activities, like someone creating new users with uncontrolled credentials."
"Technical support is excellent."
"It actually does some heuristics, and some behavioral analysis."
"The new feature that we're deploying, the new offering from Carbon Black, is MDR, which stands for manage, detect, and response. It's the most valuable feature because Carbon Black will be continuously checking the logs, and they will be advising us on how to improve some of the policies as well as review the logs. If there are any nefarious agents or things happening on the end points, they will know."
"The solution is very useful and easy to handle. You don't need much intervention with this product."
"This product has the capability of uploading scripts to the tool and this is a very comprehensive feature."
"The EDR and reports were helpful in improving our organization."
"I rate Carbon Black CB Defense an eight out of ten for the ease of its initial setup."
"It has the best live response feature."
"Compared to other tools like Linux, this solution isn't as user-friendly."
"Can be improved by allowing computers to be excluded from policies."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager can be better by making its UI more consistent."
"CyberArk meets clients' need very spot-on. It covers everything customers ask for. As for improvements, honestly, the feedback's been really positive. I haven't heard any specific areas that need work."
"The price of the solution should improve."
"Technical support is slow to respond when we run into issues."
"It's an old product and has many areas that can be improved."
"It is hard to deal with technical support if you are not certified."
"What was rolled out to my company are mixed versions of Carbon Black CB Defense, so what I'd like to see in the next release is more synchronization, where it can detect the endpoint that's running an old version and suggest updates."
"The solution needs better overall compatibility with other products."
"The directions for Splunk are spot on, but it is difficult to find anything on integration with AlienVault,"
"The solution would be more effective if there was a way to block automatically based on behavior."
"Carbon Black CB Defense has helped improve my organization by allowing us to have better data so that we can do correlation and get visibility into the alerts."
"The solution has to mature on container security and a lot of cloud environment security."
"When you view the triage, it will show you everything within a given time frame, and not only the attack that caused the alert, which is what I want to see. It shows you all the events during that time, and that can be quite confusing."
"The product's reporting capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 26 reviews while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is ranked 17th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 61 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint writes "Centralization via the cloud allows us to protect and control people working from home". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint report.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
