CAST Highlight vs CodeSonar comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CAST Logo
452 views|323 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
CodeSecure Logo
1,915 views|1,215 comparisons
87% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CAST Highlight and CodeSonar based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Synopsys, Snyk, Veracode and others in Software Composition Analysis (SCA).
To learn more, read our detailed Software Composition Analysis (SCA) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"CAST Highlight is easy to use and has a good dashboard.""It offers good performance.""The way it tells you which codebase is more ready for the cloud and which codebase is less ready is very valuable. It works seamlessly with most languages.""The most valuable features of CAST Highlight are automation and speed.""The most valuable features of the CAST Highlight are the interface and there are three notations that are very simple to understand and communicate with."

More CAST Highlight Pros →

"The most valuable feature of CodeSonar is the catching of dead code. It is helpful.""The most valuable features of CodeSonar were all the categorized classes provided, and reports of future bugs which might occur in the production code. Additionally, I found the buffer overflow and underflow useful.""CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats.""The tool is very good for detecting memory leaks.""There is nice functionality for code surfing and browsing.""It has been able to scale.""What I like best about CodeSonar is that it has fantastic speed, analysis and configuration times. Its detection of all runtime errors is also very good, though there were times it missed a few. The configuration of logs by CodeSonar is also very fantastic which I've not seen anywhere else. I also like the GUI interface of CodeSonar because it's very user friendly and the tool also shows very precise logs and results."

More CodeSonar Pros →

Cons
"The ease of configuration and customization could be improved in CAST Highlight.""There's a bit of a learning curve at the outset.""CAST Highlight could improve to allow us to comment and do a deep analysis by ourselves.""The reports that describe the issues of concern are rather abstract and the issues should be more clearly described to the user.""Its price should be better. It is a pretty costly tool. They have two products: CAST Highlight and CAST AIP. I would expect CAST Highlight to have the Help dashboard and the Engineering dashboard. These dashboards are currently a part of CAST AIP, and if these are made available in CAST Highlight, customers won't have to use two different products all the time."

More CAST Highlight Cons →

"It would be beneficial for the solution to include code standards and additional functionality for security.""The scanning tool for core architecture could be improved.""It was expensive.""CodeSonar could improve by having better coding rules so we did not have to use another solution, such as MISRA C.""In a future release, the solution should upgrade itself to the current trends and differentiate between the languages. If there are any classifications that can be set for these programming languages that would be helpful rather than having everything in the generic category.""There could be a shared licensing model for the users.""In terms of areas for improvement, the use case for CodeSonar was good, but compared to other tools, it seems CodeSonar isn't a sound static analysis tool, and this is a major con I've seen from it. Right now, in the market, people prefer sound static analysis tools, so I would have preferred if CodeSonar was developed into a sound static analysis tool formally, in terms of its algorithms, so then you can see it extensively used in the market because at the moment, here in India, only fifty to sixty customers use CodeSonar. If the product is developed into a sound static analysis tool, it could compete with Polyspace, and from its current fifty customers, that number could go up to a hundred."

More CodeSonar Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "CAST Highlight is an expensive solution. However, CAST Highlight is less expensive than the CAST AIP, but it remains too expensive and the professional services from CAST are also too expensive. The high price is part of the problem with the CAST solutions."
  • "It is a pretty costly tool. A lot of customers are resistant to using it."
  • "Basic support is included with the standard licensing feed but it can be upgraded for an additional cost."
  • "CAST Highlight is an expensive solution."
  • More CAST Highlight Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Pricing is a bit costly."
  • "The solution's price depends on the number of licenses needed and the source code for the project."
  • "Our organization purchased a license to use the solution."
  • "The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools."
  • More CodeSonar Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Composition Analysis (SCA) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable features of CAST Highlight are automation and speed.
    Top Answer:CAST Highlight is an expensive solution. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight or nine out of ten.
    Top Answer:The ease of configuration and customization could be improved in CAST Highlight.
    Top Answer:CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats.
    Top Answer:The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools. I rate its pricing a four out of ten.
    Top Answer:Our license model allows one user per license. Currently, we have limitations for VPN profiles. We can’t share the key with other users. There could be a shared licensing model for the users. It will… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    452
    Comparisons
    323
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    567
    Rating
    7.8
    Views
    1,915
    Comparisons
    1,215
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    505
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 71% of the time.
    Checkmarx One logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Snyk logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Veracode logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Black Duck logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    SonarQube logo
    Compared 49% of the time.
    Coverity logo
    Compared 19% of the time.
    Klocwork logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Polyspace Code Prover logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Semgrep Code logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    CAST Highlight is a SaaS software intelligence product for performing rapid application portfolio analysis. It automatically analyzes source code of hundreds of applications in a week for Cloud Readiness, Software Composition Analysis (Open Source risks), Resiliency, and Technical Debt. Objective software insights from automated source code analysis combined with built-in qualitative surveys for business context enable more informed decision-making about application portfolios.

    CAST is the software intelligence category leader. CAST technology can see inside custom applications with MRI-like precision, automatically generating intelligence about their inner workings - composition, architecture, transaction flows, cloud readiness, structural flaws, legal and security risks. It’s becoming essential for faster modernization for cloud, raising the speed and efficiency of Software Engineering, better open source risk control, and accurate technical due diligence. CAST operates globally with offices in North America, Europe, India, China. Visit www.castsoftware.com.

    GrammaTech enables organizations to develop software applications more efficiently, on-budget, and on-schedule by helping to eliminate harmful defects that can cause system failures, enable data breaches, and ultimately increase corporate liabilities in today’s connected world. GrammaTech is the developer of CodeSonar, the most powerful source and binary code analysis solution available today. Extraordinarily precise, CodeSonar finds, on average, 2 times more serious defects in software than other static analysis solutions. Designed for organizations with zero tolerance for defects and vulnerabilities in their applications, CodeSonar provides static analysis for applications where reliability and security are paramount - widely used by software developers in avionics, medical, automotive, industrial control, and other mission-critical applications. Some of GrammaTech's customers include Toyota, GE, Hyundai, Kawasaki, LG, Lockheed Martin, NASA, Northrop Grumman, Panasonic, and Samsung.

    Sample Customers
    Wells Fargo, Bank of NY Mellon, Northern Trust, Microsoft, Amazon, IBM, BMW, AT&T, US Army, US Air Force, US Navy, John Hancock, Marsh & McLennan, Ernst & Young, PwC, Volkswagen, Boston Consulting Group, London Stock Exchange, Telefonica, Saur France, Total Energies France, SNCF
    Viveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONY
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Insurance Company10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company22%
    Computer Software Company17%
    University9%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise74%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business63%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Synopsys, Snyk, Veracode and others in Software Composition Analysis (SCA). Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CAST Highlight is ranked 10th in Software Composition Analysis (SCA) with 5 reviews while CodeSonar is ranked 22nd in Application Security Tools with 7 reviews. CAST Highlight is rated 7.8, while CodeSonar is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CAST Highlight writes "Easy to set up with optimized and automated insights". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CodeSonar writes "Nice interface, quick to deploy, and easy to expand". CAST Highlight is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx One, Snyk, Veracode and Black Duck, whereas CodeSonar is most compared with SonarQube, Coverity, Klocwork, Polyspace Code Prover and Semgrep Code.

    We monitor all Software Composition Analysis (SCA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.