We performed a comparison between Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Huawei Enterprise Routers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two WAN Edge solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a stable solution...it is a scalable solution."
"The solution is a simple WAN solution. We've onboarded the socket on the Cato platform, and it provides connectivity. There is no complex routing."
"It is quite simple and easy to use."
"The visibility control and security aspects are amazing."
"The most valuable feature is that it also works as a next-gen firewall because it has security features."
"It's a pretty straightforward solution."
"It's a cloud-based solution that integrates well with everything."
"Cato offers all the functionality found in other solution. The life cycle management is always very stable."
"The product is very reasonably priced."
"The solution provides support for 5G connectivity."
"The solution offers good customer support and good performance."
"I have been able to connect the solution to many platforms such as Windows, Apple, and Android."
"We use the solution for point-to-point connectivity, aggregation, and radio connectivity on mTLS."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The most valuable feature of Huawei Enterprise Routers is if have two networks at different geographical locations with a great deal of distance they work together as if they are on the same cloud network."
"There is a lot of information available about routers and how to configure Huawei Routers right now."
"The tool needs to be more granular. Its reports are not very in-depth."
"They should add more sophisticated security features. It should also be integrated into the cloud."
"Cato Networks could improve their intrusion detection. There is not a lot in place."
"They can't do one-to-one NAT (Network Address Translation) in AP (their access point), and that is something that Palo Alto can do."
"The product must evolve into the endpoint domain."
"The different languages in the user interface should be enhanced."
"The solution could be made more user friendly for the administrator to use the portal. It is difficult to use it for people who are not experienced with Cato Networks."
"The solution is not cheap."
"In my country we don't have Huawei technology, we only have Huawei routers for ISP. There is no agent for Huawei in Egypt."
"The solution's technical support could be improved."
"If Huawei can use its own OEM processor, it could be a good step up for future use in the network devices."
"The internet speed reduces throughout the day. The tool is not stable."
"We have found we have to restart the routers or reconfigured them a lot of the time, this issue should improve. The quality of the hardware needs to be more durable."
"In the next release of this solution, I would like to see better bandwidth management, more granular web filtering, and portal authentication."
"There isn't really any scalability potential."
"It would be better if the vendor provided support for small enterprises."
Cato SASE Cloud Platform is ranked 5th in WAN Edge with 21 reviews while Huawei Enterprise Routers is ranked 8th in WAN Edge with 24 reviews. Cato SASE Cloud Platform is rated 8.8, while Huawei Enterprise Routers is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Cato SASE Cloud Platform writes "Useful remote worker VPN, centralized management, and simple on-boarding process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Huawei Enterprise Routers writes "A stable and easy-to-manage solution with good security and firewalls". Cato SASE Cloud Platform is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cisco SD-WAN, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet FortiGate and VMware SD-WAN, whereas Huawei Enterprise Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Cisco Enterprise Routers, Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco SD-WAN and Juniper MX Series Routers. See our Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs. Huawei Enterprise Routers report.
See our list of best WAN Edge vendors.
We monitor all WAN Edge reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.