Cedexis Impact [EOL] vs OpenText Diagnostics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Citrix Logo
views| comparisons
OpenText Logo
579 views|389 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cedexis Impact [EOL] and OpenText Diagnostics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Views
579
Comparisons
389
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
374
Rating
10.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus Diagnostics, MF Diagnostics
Learn More
Overview
Cedexis Impact monitors resource performance and continuously correlate it to business KPIs. Impact helps you identify optimization opportunities that boost application performance, improve load times, and make your website or app indispensable. Impact features easy categorization and configuration management. Each Impact view can be easily filtered to expose the granular insights needed to identify optimization opportunities. Break down results by device type, geography, ISP, browser version, and other factors.
Diagnostics software monitors application transaction health in traditional, virtualized and cloud environments allowing quick isolation and resolution of issues. It gives you a common tool to easily collaborate across the entire application lifecycle and release higher-quality applications. Diagnostics software provides deep drill down into transactions from the end user through the back end. And it uniquely serves as a single tool set for pre-production and production to diagnose application performance bottlenecks quickly and improve quality.
Sample Customers
Accor, Arte, Bets.com, DailyMotion, France Televisions, Gilead, Kingsoft Le Parisien, L'Oreal, Mozilla, Netlog, Pacnet, Government of France, Sita, Tumblr, Wargaming,net
BSkyB, Alior Bank
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Financial Services Firm12%
Manufacturing Company9%
Educational Organization8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise73%
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cedexis Impact [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while OpenText Diagnostics is ranked 33rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 4 reviews. Cedexis Impact [EOL] is rated 0.0, while OpenText Diagnostics is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Diagnostics writes "Very good for transaction level monitoring, but expensive and HP needs better support and training". Cedexis Impact [EOL] is most compared with , whereas OpenText Diagnostics is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, Broadcom DX Application Performance Management and Accedian Skylight.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.