• Home
  • Aternity AppInternals [EOL] vs. Cedexis Impact [EOL]

Aternity AppInternals [EOL] vs Cedexis Impact [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aternity AppInternals [EOL] and Cedexis Impact [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Being able to have the transaction stitched together so we can see where the problem is has proven invaluable.
Cuts down on the time to resolve complicated application issues. We have been able to trace individual transactions to identify where the issue is... Read more →
Use Cedexis Impact [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."
  • "The licensing model for v9 is better where it is an individual license per server, while v10 licenses are per JVM/ .NET and server instance. The latter model appears to be the model that other APM vendors are using."

    • More Aternity AppInternals [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    Unranked
    In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SteelCentral AppInternals, OPNET ACE, AppInternals Xpert
    Learn More
    Riverbed
    Citrix
    Overview

    Simplified high-definition APM visibility leveraging Real User Monitoring, Synthetic Monitoring, and OpenTelemetry, that is scalable, easy to use and deploy, and unifies insights across end users, applications, networks, and the cloud-native ecosystem

    Cedexis Impact monitors resource performance and continuously correlate it to business KPIs. Impact helps you identify optimization opportunities that boost application performance, improve load times, and make your website or app indispensable. Impact features easy categorization and configuration management. Each Impact view can be easily filtered to expose the granular insights needed to identify optimization opportunities. Break down results by device type, geography, ISP, browser version, and other factors.
    Sample Customers
    National Instruments, Allianz
    Accor, Arte, Bets.com, DailyMotion, France Televisions, Gilead, Kingsoft Le Parisien, L'Oreal, Mozilla, Netlog, Pacnet, Government of France, Sita, Tumblr, Wargaming,net
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider29%
    Healthcare Company14%
    Government14%
    Media Company14%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise70%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Aternity AppInternals [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Cedexis Impact [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Aternity AppInternals [EOL] is rated 8.2, while Cedexis Impact [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Aternity AppInternals [EOL] writes "We use it to see the experience of users hitting our sites and analyze performance by region, browser, etc". On the other hand, Aternity AppInternals [EOL] is most compared with IDERA Precise, whereas Cedexis Impact [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.