Cisco ASx500 vs Microsoft Forefront [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco Logo
37 views|17 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
views| comparisons
85% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco ASx500 and Microsoft Forefront [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, SonicWall, Cisco and others in Universal Access Gateways.
To learn more, read our detailed Universal Access Gateways Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This product is not too expensive and there are no costs apart from the standard licensing fee."
  • "We pay approximately $15,000 a month but that includes everything together, such as hardware."
  • More Cisco ASx500 Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Views
    37
    Comparisons
    17
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In Universal Access Gateways
    Buyer's Guide
    Universal Access Gateways
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, SonicWall, Cisco and others in Universal Access Gateways. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ASx500
    MS Forefront [EOL]
    Learn More
    Overview
    Information Not Available
    Our agile methodology and our integration expertise brings you the best catalyst to craft solutions of exceptional quality and distinctive success.
    Sample Customers
    Aegean Motorway, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, BC Hydro, Beachbody, City of Biel, Department of Education Western Australia, Dundee Precious Metals, Fontys University, John Eagle Auto Group, Katy Independent School District, National Airport of Romania, North West Redwater, The Department of Education in Western Australia
    EUROVIA CS, a. s., King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz Public Education Devel, Bank Alfalah Ltd., CLEAResult, St. Lucie County Public Schools, Wiltshire Council
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise50%
    Large Enterprise25%
    Buyer's Guide
    Universal Access Gateways
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, SonicWall, Cisco and others in Universal Access Gateways. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco ASx500 is ranked 3rd in Universal Access Gateways while Microsoft Forefront [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Universal Access Gateways. Cisco ASx500 is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Forefront [EOL] is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco ASx500 writes "Secure, scalable, and straightforward installation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Forefront [EOL] writes "There are a few tweaks I would explore although this has been an outstanding product line". Cisco ASx500 is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Forefront [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Universal Access Gateways vendors.

    We monitor all Universal Access Gateways reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.