We performed a comparison between Cisco Piston Enterprise OS and Runecast based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management."It offers enough support so that you don't need to have the need to get another device."
"Runecast is a good partner for VMware. Once we have installed it, we can see all the problems and issues. It also has VMware knowledge-based articles."
"The solution is just too expensive, so maybe the pricing could be better."
"The product lacks network assessment capabilities. We cannot view our network assets or scan switches, routers, or IPs for vulnerabilities and issues."
Earn 20 points
Cisco Piston Enterprise OS is ranked 51st in Cloud Management while Runecast is ranked 16th in Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) with 1 review. Cisco Piston Enterprise OS is rated 9.0, while Runecast is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Piston Enterprise OS writes "A simple interface and helpful support for a solution that grows with us". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Runecast writes "Helps with risk assessments for containers, assessing security, and ensuring container compliance". Cisco Piston Enterprise OS is most compared with Abiquo, whereas Runecast is most compared with VMware Aria Operations.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.