Compare Cisco Piston OpenStack vs. Mirantis Cloud Platform

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
8th
out of 8 in OpenStack
Views
17
Comparisons
3
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
2nd
out of 8 in OpenStack
Views
627
Comparisons
415
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Piston OpenStack
MCP
Learn More
Overview
Information Not Available

Mirantis Cloud Platform (MCP) is a comprehensive multi-cloud software stack built with an operations-centric approach. It continuously delivers automated infrastructure updates and intelligent application delivery through a CI/CD pipeline toolchain while also providing proactive monitoring and analytics to ensure maximum availability. MCP can include OpenStack and/or Kubernetes to offer bare metal, VMs and containers, along with Ceph, OpenContrail and Calico for software-defined storage and networking.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Piston OpenStack
Learn more about Mirantis Cloud Platform
Sample Customers
Dualtec Cloud Builders
Volkswagen, EMC, Tata Communications, Shenzhen Stock Exchange, Saudi Telecom Company, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, G‑Core Labs, Bailian Group
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company19%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm15%
Media Company13%

Cisco Piston OpenStack is ranked 8th in OpenStack while Mirantis Cloud Platform is ranked 2nd in OpenStack. Cisco Piston OpenStack is rated 0.0, while Mirantis Cloud Platform is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Cisco Piston OpenStack is most compared with , whereas Mirantis Cloud Platform is most compared with Platform9 Managed OpenStack, Red Hat CloudForms, Ubuntu Linux and Google Container Engine.

See our list of best OpenStack vendors.

We monitor all OpenStack reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.