Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Sourcefire SNORT vs. Cisco Stealthwatch and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
408,154 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
The URL filtering is very good and you can create a group for customized URLs.
The most valuable feature is the ability to automatically learn the traffic in our environment, and change the merit recommendations based on that.
In general, the features are all great. However, if I need to take hardware for ASA, because they need to upgrade to Firepower, we want to create rules. For that, most of the time we go to the command line. Right now Firepower is working really hard on the grid. You can apply all those rules to the grid. Even if you want to monitor the logs, for example, the activity will tell you which particular user has been blocked because of that rule. Firepower's monitoring interface is very good, because you can see each and every piece. ASA also had it, but there you needed to type the command and be under the server to see all that stuff. In Firepower you have the possibility to go directly to the firewall. The way the monitoring is displayed is also very nice. The feature I appreciate most in Firepower is actually the grid. The grid has worked very well.
I like most of Cisco's features, like malware detection and URL filtering.
The most valuable feature of this solution is the filtering.
The solution can be integrated with some network electors like Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco ISE, and Active Directory to provide the client with authentication certificates.
The whole solution is very good, and stable.
Cisco technical support is unbeatable. It offers a premium service every time.
The most valuable feature is anomaly detection, where it finds things that are not allowed internally.
Most of the engineers I've worked with have been really good. Very knowledgeable and easy to work with.
Being able to graph and show data to management has improved our organization. We can show the data to the higher-ups. It shows them that it's picking up on these anomalies and doing its job.
It's a dependable product that is able to pinpoint where we have vulnerabilities if they occur.
Using the Cognitive Analytics feature, we have complete visibility that we didn’t have before.
The most valuable feature about this solution is that it gives me insight of my network.
It has improved our internal knowledge of what's going on with the network, and that's helpful.
The most valuable features of this solution are the logging, keeping threats under control, and keeping our data and environment secure.
There are problems setting up VPNs for some regions.
We are unhappy with technical support for this solution, and it is not as professional as what we typically expect from Cisco.
To be frank, the product is not really stable, although they're working on that. Whenever I go to the technical community with an issue, they will usually say that it is not there yet, but the technical team are working on it. The issues are not insolvable. I think they should just keep working on the product to make sure that the product can become very stable. The technical support is great. I appreciate that. We have a lot of communities supporting Firepower now, so you can find help for whatever issue you have.
I don't think this solution is a time-based control system, because one cannot filter traffic based on time.
If the price is brought down then everybody will be happy.
With the next release, I would like to see some PBR, so that you can do the configuration with the features.
The customization of the rules can be simplified.
The pricing needs to be improved. We have lots of low-budget clients around us. Budget constraints are always a deterrent in our market.
The usability of this solution needs to be improved.
We've run into some issues with the configuration.
They should include Citrix VDIs in the next release.
The GUI could use some improvement. Being able to find features more easily would be a great improvement if it was simplified.
The initial setup is complex, as there is a lot to configure.
It hasn't really improved our direct detection rate but it has definitely reduced our incident response time as we wouldn't have been able to detect threats or immediate risks without this solution.
I would like to see more and cleaner reporting. For example, if I pull up Steven and I want to look and maybe compare him to what you've done in the past week, and compare that to the past six months, the point would be to see what the difference in activity looks like over this time. I don't see that capability in reporting to date. You see that trend but you don't really see a straightforward comparison. That right there is key to what we want to see about the normal activity.
It is time-consuming to set it up and understand how the tool works.
Pricing and Cost Advice
I don't know the exact amount, but most of the time when I go to a company with a proposition, they will say, "This thing that you are selling is good, but it's expensive. Why don't you propose something like FortiGate, Check Point, or Palo Alto?" Cisco device are expensive compared to other devices.
Licensing for this solution is paid on a yearly basis.
We have a three-year license for this solution.
Our fees are approximately $3,000 USD.
Licensing is on a yearly basis.
We pay for support costs on a yearly basis.
On a yearly basis, licensing is somewhere around $30,000.
The yearly licensing cost is about $50,000.
The pricing for this solution is good.
The licensing costs are outrageous.
out of 43 in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software
Average Words per Review
out of 17 in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)
Average Words per Review
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
|Sourcefire SNORT||Cisco Stealthwatch Enterprise, Lancope StealthWatch|
Snort is an open-source, rule-based, intrusion detection and prevention system. It combines the benefits of signature-, protocol-, and anomaly-based inspection methods to deliver flexible protection from malware attacks. Snort gained notoriety for being able to accurately detect threats at high speeds.
Cisco Stealthwatch uses NetFlow to provide visibility across the network, data center, branch offices, and cloud. Its advanced security analytics uncover stealthy attacks on the extended network. Stealthwatch helps you use your existing network as a security sensor and enforcer to dramatically improve your threat defense.
Learn more about Cisco Sourcefire SNORT
Learn more about Cisco Stealthwatch
|CareCore, City of Biel, Dimension Data, LightEdge, Lone Star College System, National Rugby League, Port Aventura, Smart City Networks, Telecom Italia, The Department of Education in Western Australia||Edge Web Hosting, Telenor Norway, Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana, Webster Financial Corporation, Westinghouse Electric, VMware, TIAA-CREF|
Software R&D Company38%
Comms Service Provider18%
Financial Services Firm9%
K 12 Educational Company Or School7%
Financial Services Firm16%
Comms Service Provider27%
Software R&D Company19%
See also Cisco Sourcefire SNORT Reviews, Cisco Stealthwatch Reviews, and our list of Best Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software Companies.