We performed a comparison between Cisco Threat Grid and Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Recorded Future, Check Point Software Technologies, Microsoft and others in Threat Intelligence Platforms."It is easy to implement and is very scalable. It also comes with very good documentation. Cisco provides good technical support as well."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with firewalls. It's integrated with AMP so the ecosystem with equal solutions from Threat Grid is good with CISCO products."
"The simplicity of implementation is valuable."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"The product's anti-spam and malware-scanning features are useful. We scan email attachments, documents, and malicious codes."
"The product provides efficient email security for sending links and file attachments."
"It is very scalable. There are approximately 2,000 endpoints and up to 200 servers in our company."
"The product is useful when the end user downloads malware files."
"The product’s most valuable feature is the ability to provide threat detection and protection simultaneously."
"They have a very transparent roadmap for the product."
"I rate the tool's stability a ten out of ten."
"They come in and have multiple management solutions but it doesn't scan or doesn't have the ability to look at every file extension."
"I was told that the user interface could be more user friendly and easy in comparison to that of competitors. I remember that there is a competitor who has a much easier interface for many users to interact with."
"Support must be improved."
"The solution could be more stable and precise because, at times, the threats detected are not legitimate."
"Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is evolving and needs to fix and enhance numerous issues like stability and licensing. The continuous rebranding and licensing changes are confusing."
"I would like to see more integration with other solutions. For example, integration well with Microsoft but not with other solutions."
"Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence should integrate with different platforms."
"The software is expensive."
"I would like for there to be extra confirmation that there aren't viruses. Even if the virus detection software is always running there could be hidden applications that are using the computer."
"Technical support could be a bit better."
"I would like to see more AI features and capabilities."
More Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Threat Grid is ranked 21st in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 3 reviews while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is ranked 3rd in Threat Intelligence Platforms with 23 reviews. Cisco Threat Grid is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Threat Grid writes "Has good integration with firewalls but has limited file extensions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence writes "A tool that offers endpoint protection with low maintenance costs". Cisco Threat Grid is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon and Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus, whereas Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence is most compared with Microsoft Sentinel, STAXX, ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP), VirusTotal and Splunk Mission Control.
See our list of best Threat Intelligence Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
