Compare Citrix SD-WAN vs. Ipanema IpIengine

Citrix SD-WAN is ranked 1st in WAN Optimization with 3 reviews while Ipanema IpIengine is ranked 13th in WAN Optimization. Citrix SD-WAN is rated 8.4, while Ipanema IpIengine is rated 0. The top reviewer of Citrix SD-WAN writes "Enables us to check if a laptop is in our domain or not". On the other hand, Citrix SD-WAN is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, F5 Traffic Management Operating System and Fortinet FortiWAN, whereas Ipanema IpIengine is most compared with Riverbed Steelhead, Citrix SD-WAN and WAAS.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Citrix SD-WAN Logo
5,479 views|4,372 comparisons
Ipanema IpIengine Logo
711 views|615 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Ipanema IpIengine? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, GFI, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: May 2020.
418,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
As NetScaler is now, I find it quite pricey.It's a little bit on the high side compared to the other products.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which WAN Optimization solutions are best for your needs.
418,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
1st
out of 23 in WAN Optimization
Views
5,479
Comparisons
4,372
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
440
Avg. Rating
8.3
13th
out of 23 in WAN Optimization
Views
711
Comparisons
615
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
Citrix CloudBridge, WOC, NetScaler SD-WANIpIengine
Learn
Citrix
Ipanema Technologies
Video Not Available
Overview

Citrix SD-WAN (formerly NetScaler SD-WAN) is a next- generation WAN Edge solution that simplifies digital transformation for enterprises. It offers the best application experience for SaaS, cloud, and virtual apps & desktops; comprehensive security; and cloud choice with automation to ensure an always-on workspace.

The Ipanema Autonomic Networking System (ANS) uses both software and hardware components. The fully featured hardware components are called ip|engines. These devices are installed within the customer VPN at edge locations, typically between a CPE router and the LAN. Requiring no specific local configuration except an IP address, an ip|engine is a self-managed and cooperative device that operates under the control of the ANS central management software, called SALSA. Each ip|engine acts as a local point of control within ANS. ip|engines work collectively in real-time to discover the applications and measure the network's performance and usage ip|engine. As part of ANS, the ip|engines cooperate and tune themselves automatically to the dynamic nature of the application traffic, globally enforcing the Application SLAs. They take into account meshed flows, different types of congestion, application competition for resources and so on. The ip|engines adapt to longer term changes within the business, such as a change in the distribution of users across sites, a newly deployed application or a new site, as well as the evolution of infrastructure and services into the cloud.

Offer
Learn more about Citrix SD-WAN
Learn more about Ipanema IpIengine
Sample Customers
AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Cornerstone Home Lending Inc., Dallara, ecVision, Essar, Eurofred, Groupe Promutuel, HMSHost Corporation, Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines Ltd, Royal Caribbean InternationalValeo, KBC, Henkel, Bouygues Telecom, Gemalto, VDABês, Globus, EADS, faurecia, Fiat, Renault Nissan, Safran, Valeo, Volvo, Aviva, Visa, L'Oreal, Hasbro, Moet & Chandon Champagne
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company35%
Comms Service Provider19%
Real Estate/Law Firm6%
Media Company5%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Citrix, GFI, Riverbed and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: May 2020.
418,116 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.