Compare Citrix SD-WAN vs. Ipanema IpIengine

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Citrix SD-WAN Logo
3,779 views|2,690 comparisons
Ipanema IpIengine Logo
358 views|309 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cato Networks, Citrix, GFI and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: September 2021.
534,299 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"As NetScaler is now, I find it quite pricey.""The price of the subscription should be cheaper."

More Citrix SD-WAN Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which WAN Optimization solutions are best for your needs.
534,299 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The best feature is the backup capability, where all of the users' computers are tied into a central data repository.
Top Answer: We have a perpetual license, which is very important because it allows us to manage our costs, rather than having a monthly or yearly subscription. A yearly license is okay except that we consider… more »
Top Answer: Citrix should continue to offer a perpetual licensing model because it is very important to us.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
2nd
out of 17 in WAN Optimization
Views
3,779
Comparisons
2,690
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
455
Rating
9.0
10th
out of 17 in WAN Optimization
Views
358
Comparisons
309
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
Citrix CloudBridge, WOC, NetScaler SD-WAN
IpIengine
Learn More
Ipanema Technologies
Video Not Available
Overview

Citrix SD-WAN (formerly NetScaler SD-WAN) is a next- generation WAN Edge solution that simplifies digital transformation for enterprises. It offers the best application experience for SaaS, cloud, and virtual apps & desktops; comprehensive security; and cloud choice with automation to ensure an always-on workspace.

The Ipanema Autonomic Networking System (ANS) uses both software and hardware components. The fully featured hardware components are called ip|engines. These devices are installed within the customer VPN at edge locations, typically between a CPE router and the LAN. Requiring no specific local configuration except an IP address, an ip|engine is a self-managed and cooperative device that operates under the control of the ANS central management software, called SALSA. Each ip|engine acts as a local point of control within ANS. ip|engines work collectively in real-time to discover the applications and measure the network's performance and usage ip|engine. As part of ANS, the ip|engines cooperate and tune themselves automatically to the dynamic nature of the application traffic, globally enforcing the Application SLAs. They take into account meshed flows, different types of congestion, application competition for resources and so on. The ip|engines adapt to longer term changes within the business, such as a change in the distribution of users across sites, a newly deployed application or a new site, as well as the evolution of infrastructure and services into the cloud.

Offer
Learn more about Citrix SD-WAN
Learn more about Ipanema IpIengine
Sample Customers
AIDS Healthcare Foundation, Cornerstone Home Lending Inc., Dallara, ecVision, Essar, Eurofred, Groupe Promutuel, HMSHost Corporation, Royal Caribbean Cruise Lines Ltd, Royal Caribbean International
Valeo, KBC, Henkel, Bouygues Telecom, Gemalto, VDABês, Globus, EADS, faurecia, Fiat, Renault Nissan, Safran, Valeo, Volvo, Aviva, Visa, L'Oreal, Hasbro, Moet & Chandon Champagne
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider33%
Computer Software Company30%
Government4%
Insurance Company4%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise50%
Large Enterprise38%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cato Networks, Citrix, GFI and others in WAN Optimization. Updated: September 2021.
534,299 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Citrix SD-WAN is ranked 2nd in WAN Optimization with 5 reviews while Ipanema IpIengine is ranked 10th in WAN Optimization. Citrix SD-WAN is rated 9.0, while Ipanema IpIengine is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Citrix SD-WAN writes "Lines run Active-Active so we get better bandwidth usage and we don't have backup lines sitting idle". On the other hand, Citrix SD-WAN is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, VMware SD-WAN, Riverbed Steelhead, Meraki SD-WAN and Talari, whereas Ipanema IpIengine is most compared with Riverbed Steelhead and WAAS.

See our list of best WAN Optimization vendors.

We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.