We performed a comparison between Cloudability and Datapipe Cloud Analytics for AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, VMware and others in Cloud Cost Management."Each user can have their own dashboard that they want to consume. Instead of having to share one dashboard for multiple users, you can create individual views for each user to view, and that view will contain only their own accounts, which allows for separation of data."
"Transparency and visibility are the key features."
"The sizing recommendation will look, and say, "You are only using this at 80%," then recommend a better fit for you."
"It provides us visibility, then we can turn around and can give the leadership team more information, which we could not previously give them."
"The tool helps us to resize on AWS correctly."
"We use the product to get a detailed level of transparency on the cloud strengths."
"One of the standout features of the solution is its groups and views functionality. The solution is highly-stable. The solution is highly-scalable. The customer support is good. They can be easily contacted. The initial setup is straightforward. It's an excellent tool, especially when dealing with multiple clouds. It streamlines the process, eliminating the need to check each cloud individually."
"The pricing isn't too expensive."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
"The dashboard needs to include more graphs per team to show what individual teams are spending in a given time period."
"We have dealt with a few technical support people where we ask for one thing and they might not deliver straightaway. It seems like they are a stretched across multiple customers."
"The API is not well-documented. It is not straightforward and difficult to use. This needs to be improved, as it is very difficult for our developers to develop automation around it."
"We would like them to have a linear regression, so we can be predictive for budgets, allocations, and the year's follow ups. We also want to have a longer window of analytics with better certainty that our workload will fit the model, not just in a two week window."
"I wish there was a feature to temporarily remove certain recommendations from the list for teams that couldn't implement them immediately. I believe Cloudability could improve its automation functionality and enhance cost allocation modeling."
"In general, I feel Cloudability wasn't able to support many resources."
"There is always room for improvement in education and training. We are not that mature in terms of our automation. It could help us identify where we could optimize in terms of build."
"Cloudability needs to focus on more cloud providers."
"I'd like to see it coordinated or integrated with more of a data catalog."
Earn 20 points
Cloudability is ranked 5th in Cloud Cost Management with 12 reviews while Datapipe Cloud Analytics for AWS is ranked 9th in Cloud Analytics. Cloudability is rated 7.6, while Datapipe Cloud Analytics for AWS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cloudability writes "An excellent solution for dealing with multiple clouds". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datapipe Cloud Analytics for AWS writes "Stable, straightforward to set up and does have good integration with various useful tools". Cloudability is most compared with VMware Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, Azure Cost Management, IBM Turbonomic, Densify and Harness, whereas Datapipe Cloud Analytics for AWS is most compared with .
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.