We performed a comparison between Cloudability and Oracle Big Data Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, VMware and others in Cloud Cost Management."The sizing recommendation will look, and say, "You are only using this at 80%," then recommend a better fit for you."
"One of the standout features of the solution is its groups and views functionality. The solution is highly-stable. The solution is highly-scalable. The customer support is good. They can be easily contacted. The initial setup is straightforward. It's an excellent tool, especially when dealing with multiple clouds. It streamlines the process, eliminating the need to check each cloud individually."
"Transparency and visibility are the key features."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to create reports and dashboards."
"The support from IBM is fantastic"
"It provides us visibility, then we can turn around and can give the leadership team more information, which we could not previously give them."
"The tool helps us to resize on AWS correctly."
"It has already given us insight into how to optimize. So, we are now ramping up steadily its usage."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is the fact that it is open source."
"The solution's most valuable aspects are its data integration and data virtualization."
"The dashboard needs to include more graphs per team to show what individual teams are spending in a given time period."
"The API is not well-documented. It is not straightforward and difficult to use. This needs to be improved, as it is very difficult for our developers to develop automation around it."
"I wish there was a feature to temporarily remove certain recommendations from the list for teams that couldn't implement them immediately. I believe Cloudability could improve its automation functionality and enhance cost allocation modeling."
"Cloudability needs to improve on data collection from cloud sources."
"Right now, what we're doing is we are manually putting the data in it, which is something which we don't like about Cloudability."
"We would like them to have a linear regression, so we can be predictive for budgets, allocations, and the year's follow ups. We also want to have a longer window of analytics with better certainty that our workload will fit the model, not just in a two week window."
"We have dealt with a few technical support people where we ask for one thing and they might not deliver straightaway. It seems like they are a stretched across multiple customers."
"There is always room for improvement in education and training. We are not that mature in terms of our automation. It could help us identify where we could optimize in terms of build."
"We've had some issues with stability."
"The solution needs to improve the functionality of the auto-deduplication."
Earn 20 points
Cloudability is ranked 5th in Cloud Cost Management with 12 reviews while Oracle Big Data Cloud Service is ranked 8th in Cloud Analytics. Cloudability is rated 7.6, while Oracle Big Data Cloud Service is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cloudability writes "An excellent solution for dealing with multiple clouds". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Big Data Cloud Service writes "Easy to set up with good data integration and data virtualization". Cloudability is most compared with Azure Cost Management, VMware Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, IBM Turbonomic, Densify and Harness, whereas Oracle Big Data Cloud Service is most compared with .
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
