Compare CloudCheckr CMx High Security vs. Greenqloud qstack

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Turbonomic, Nutanix and others in Cloud Management. Updated: July 2021.
522,281 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"If you're a super-small business, it may be a little bit pricey for you... But in large, enterprise companies where money is, maybe, less of an issue, Turbonomic is not that expensive. I can't imagine why any big company would not buy it, for what it does.""It was an annual buy-in. You basically purchase it based on your host type stuff. The buy-in was about 20K, and the annual maintenance is about $3,000 a year.""I'm not involved in any of the billing, but my understanding is that is fairly expensive.""We see ROI in extended support agreements (ESA) for old software. Migration activities seem to be where Turbonomic has really benefited us the most. It's one click and done. We have new machines ready to go with Turbonomic, which are properly sized instead of somebody sitting there with a spreadsheet and guessing. So, my return on investment would certainly be on currency, from a software and hardware perspective.""When we have expanded our licensing, it has always been easy to make an ROI-based decision. So, it's reasonably priced. We would like to have it cheaper, but we get more benefit from it than we pay for it. At the end of the day, that's all you can hope for.""I know there have been some issues with the billing, when the numbers were first proposed, as to how much we would save. There was a huge miscommunication on our part. Turbonomic was led to believe that we could optimize our AWS footprint, because we didn't know we couldn't. So, we were promised savings of $750,000. Then, when we came to implement Turbonomic, the developers in AWS said, "Absolutely not. You're not putting that in our environment. We can't scale down anything because they coded it." Our AWS environment is a legacy environment. It has all these old applications, where all the developers who have made it are no longer with the company. Those applications generate a ton of money for us. So, if one breaks, we are really in trouble and they didn't want to have to deal with an environment that was changing and couldn't be supported. That number went from $750,000 to about $450,000. However, that wasn't Turbonomic's fault.""It is an endpoint type license, which is fine. It is not overly expensive.""The pricing and licensing are fair. We purchase based on benchmark pricing, which we have been able to get. There are no surprise charges nor hidden fees."

More Turbonomic Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
522,281 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The product is fairly priced right now. Given its capabilities, it is excellently priced. We think that the product will… more »
Top Answer: There is an opportunity for improvement with some of Turbonomic's permissions internally for role-based access control… more »
Top Answer: We primarily use it as a cost reduction tool regarding our cloud spend in Azure, as far as performance optimization or… more »
Top Answer: CloudCheckr can be very slow sometimes. It's tough to extract or, rather, it takes time to extract information when the… more »
Top Answer: I primarily am using this for multiple customers on Azure and AWS. I use it to do the monthly billing, optimization, and… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
VMTurbo Operations Manager
CloudCheckr CMP
Learn More
Overview

Turbonomic, an IBM Company, provides Application Resource Management (ARM) software used by customers to assure application performance* and governance by dynamically resourcing applications across hybrid and multicloud environments. Turbonomic Network Performance Management (NPM) provides modern monitoring and analytics solutions to help assure continuous network performance at scale across multivendor networks for enterprises, carriers and managed services providers.

For further information, please visit www.turbonomic.com

www.turbonomic.com/resources/case-studies

The CloudCheckr Cloud Management Platform (CMP) provides full visibility and control to reduce costs, improve cybersecurity posture, and automate critical tasks to accelerate cloud agility for modern enterprises and service providers.

Qstack is a comprehensive cloud management platform that makes it easy to deploy a private, hybrid, or public cloud. Built to be compatible, Qstack is able to run on any commodity hardware and is hypervisor-agnostic, giving companies the flexibility to employ what’s best suited for their infrastructure needs, without being locked into a specific vendor.

Offer
Learn more about Turbonomic
Learn more about CloudCheckr CMx High Security
Learn more about Greenqloud qstack
Sample Customers
JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citi, ANZ, Credit Suisse, State Street, Morningstar, VOYA, TPICAP, LPL Financial, Cisco, BMC, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Agilysys, MetLife, Hiscox, Humana, Tokio Marine, Allscripts, SHARP, Providence St. Joseph Health, NBC Universal, pwc, KPMG, Wayfair, Carhartt, Tiffany & Co., UCLA, NASA, NIH
HATech, Vimeo, RackSpace, NASA, Pearson Education, Fannie Mae, Smartronix, Ingram Micro, MediaMath, FOCoS Innovations, Ocado, Cloudar, Cornell University
Advania, HP, CB Technologies Inc., Redapt Engineering Co Ltd, vmware
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company14%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company12%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider24%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider19%
Retailer4%
Financial Services Firm4%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise63%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise52%
Large Enterprise28%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Turbonomic, Nutanix and others in Cloud Management. Updated: July 2021.
522,281 professionals have used our research since 2012.

CloudCheckr CMx High Security is ranked 13th in Cloud Management with 3 reviews while Greenqloud qstack is ranked 63rd in Cloud Management. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is rated 7.6, while Greenqloud qstack is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of CloudCheckr CMx High Security writes "Enterprise-grade solution for cloud optimization that offers excellent support". On the other hand, CloudCheckr CMx High Security is most compared with CloudHealth, Azure Cost Management, AWS Trusted Advisor and Cloudability, whereas Greenqloud qstack is most compared with .

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.