CloudStack vs OpenText Cloud Service Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Apache Logo
2,236 views|1,568 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
270 views|198 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CloudStack and OpenText Cloud Service Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed CloudStack vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is very easy to install and manage. It has the all modules in one node, unlike other software (OpenStack). The product allows a customized look and feel, and the ability to add custom workflows.""You can use a single API to get things done, rather than multiple APIs on multiple modules.""We like the virtualization capabilities.""Key features include stability, centralized management design that scales well, and transparent interoperability with different hypervisors and manufacturers..""The structuring of the components and isolated environments helped us when using parts of the framework at different levels of product development.""It was easy to deploy, both for PoC and production (with HA).""Multiple types of hypervisor support, multi-zone support, and VPC are great valuable features.""Killer features for me were: support for many hypervisors, ability to match business logic, "everything in one box," available APIs."

More CloudStack Pros →

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user friendly the solution is.""The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management."

More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Pros →

Cons
"CS has very descriptive logging, and every time I faced issues and asked for help, I didn’t get any reply from the community. Reason? Its quite obvious. CS runs on specific environments, unique to each case. So, unless it is a functional issue of CS, nobody can help you. All issues were resolved by myself going through logs. This is another reason why you need smart enough people to manage it. Engineers must have knowledge of hypervisors and understand how CS interacts with them.""The absence of the feature, deploy an instance from a snapshot, is the weak point of the platform. It is a feature that everyone needs nowadays.""The numerous, multi-layered drill-down menus make it difficult to find one simple knob to turn.""The area of Apache CloudStack that could stand the most improvement is the functionality/features around the virtual routers. They can be somewhat cumbersome to deal with at times and are the least stable piece of the product.""It is not widely used so Google does not help very much when you are troubleshooting, and the CloudStack forum is not very active.""There are some minor things that can be improved even more such as, perhaps, a bit more polishing on the GUI side to catch up with the API possibilities (which are really extensive) but otherwise nothing critical.""VPN P2S is cutting all connections except the CloudStack environment for the user when he is connected. I would like to have VPN like Cisco's AnyConnect.""For time consuming operations like storage migrations, volume Snapshot restore and the like, we faced issues like MySQL operations timing out and status update failures. Those areas needs improvement."

More CloudStack Cons →

"OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support.""I would like fewer restrictions as a software tester."

More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The Apache CloudStack is open source, so you do not have licenses to purchase."
  • "​Give an effort to planning. If possible, contract a specialized consultant company for the initial setup and knowledge transfer.​​"
  • "As far as I know, CS is still free of charge. If you want to pay some money, Citrix Cloud Platform is based on CS, I think. As for hypervisors – everything as usual, you need to pay for VMware and vCenter. As for XenServer, recently they changed the free feature list, so you may need to pay some money to get useful features like XenMotion."
  • "There is no license, so the product is free unless you are buying professional technical support services."
  • "CloudStack is an open source solution, so you don't need to pay anything for it. When our company develops something specially for CloudStack, it is donated to the Apache Software Foundation and provided to anyone that wants to use it."
  • "The solution is open-source and free."
  • "It is a 100% open-source solution needing just an Apache license. Also, there are no hidden fees to be paid."
  • "CloudStack is an open-source product."
  • More CloudStack Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "OpenText Cloud Service Automation's pricing is average."
  • More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The initial implementation process was quite good.
    Top Answer:CloudStack is an open-source product. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten. It provides good value.
    Top Answer:The product had some limitations. So, I decided to write my own stack from scratch. The product does not have an easily implementable payment gateway. It must provide a payment gateway hook in future… more »
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management.
    Top Answer:OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support.
    Top Answer:My organization uses the enterprise server solution, Micro Focus, on Azure. We are working on a project to migrate a mainframe code to the micro-enterprise developer on Azure, submitting our JCL jobs… more »
    Ranking
    12th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    2,236
    Comparisons
    1,568
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    735
    Rating
    8.3
    27th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    270
    Comparisons
    198
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    390
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Vmops, Cloud.com
    Micro Focus Cloud Service Automation, Cloud Service Automation Manager, HPE Cloud Service Automation
    Learn More
    Overview
    Apache CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

    OpenText Cloud Service Automation provides open, heterogeneous, extensible enterprise-grade cloud service lifecycle management to design and orchestrate full stack services. CSA embraces existing automation assets with an enhanced orchestration engine, which provides IT with an informed, transparent delivery of secure compliant services for the hybrid cloud.

    Sample Customers
    GreenQloud, Exoscale, TomTom, ASG, PC Extreme, ISWest, Grid'5000
    China Merchants Bank, Osiatis
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Educational Organization9%
    University9%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Manufacturing Company16%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise51%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Large Enterprise86%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    CloudStack vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about CloudStack vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CloudStack is ranked 12th in Cloud Management with 29 reviews while OpenText Cloud Service Automation is ranked 27th in Cloud Management with 6 reviews. CloudStack is rated 8.0, while OpenText Cloud Service Automation is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of CloudStack writes "A solution that strikes a balance between user-friendliness, scalability, and stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Cloud Service Automation writes "Comes with life cycle management features but needs improvement in installation ". CloudStack is most compared with OpenNebula, vCloud Director, Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure and VMware Aria Automation, whereas OpenText Cloud Service Automation is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform. See our CloudStack vs. OpenText Cloud Service Automation report.

    See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.