Compare ICON DevOps Services vs. coMakeIT Agile Development Services
Ranking  | |
Views 4 Comparisons 1 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 3 Comparisons 1 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
Popular Comparisons | |
Also Known As | |
| coMakeIT Agile Development as a Service | |
Learn | |
| coMakeIT | ICON Agility Video Not Available |
Overview | |
Waterfall models with their sequential approach to software development and big-bang software releases/deployments are passé. Software makers no longer have the luxury of long cycles of design-develop-integrate-test-deploy phases, due to their inherent pitfalls such as cost and schedule overruns, inconsistent quality, changing requirements, and scope creep. | Agile promises value delivery, but without DevOps as part of your Transformation, you are left with significant issues, including: -Late deliveries due to extended testing times
ICON solves these problems and more using DevOps Test Automation Solutions and DevOps Strategic Solutions. Our experts help you automate away the flaws and build skills to improve the quality of software from "Concept to Cash." |
Offer | |
Learn more about coMakeIT Agile Development Services | Learn more about ICON DevOps Services |
Sample Customers | |
| Visionplanner, Iddink Group, MPO, HOTflo, Stargate | Information Not Available |
coMakeIT Agile Development Services is ranked 24th in Agile and DevOps Services while ICON DevOps Services is ranked 27th in Agile and DevOps Services. coMakeIT Agile Development Services is rated 0.0, while ICON DevOps Services is rated 0.0. On the other hand, coMakeIT Agile Development Services is most compared with , whereas ICON DevOps Services is most compared with .
See our list of best Agile and DevOps Services vendors.
We monitor all Agile and DevOps Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.