ICON DevOps Services vs coMakeIT Agile Development Services comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
17th
Views
24
Comparisons
11
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
19th
Views
23
Comparisons
9
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Also Known As
coMakeIT Agile Development as a Service
Learn More
ICON Agility
Video Not Available
Overview

Waterfall models with their sequential approach to software development and big-bang software releases/deployments are passé. Software makers no longer have the luxury of long cycles of design-develop-integrate-test-deploy phases, due to their inherent pitfalls such as cost and schedule overruns, inconsistent quality, changing requirements, and scope creep.

Agile promises value delivery, but without DevOps as part of your Transformation, you are left with significant issues, including:

-Late deliveries due to extended testing times
-Reduced quality due to late identification of errors
-Operational concerns not properly considered

ICON solves these problems and more using DevOps Test Automation Solutions and DevOps Strategic Solutions. Our experts help you automate away the flaws and build skills to improve the quality of software from "Concept to Cash."

Sample Customers
Visionplanner, Iddink Group, MPO, HOTflo, Stargate
Information Not Available

coMakeIT Agile Development Services is ranked 17th in Agile and DevOps Services while ICON DevOps Services is ranked 19th in Agile and DevOps Services. coMakeIT Agile Development Services is rated 0.0, while ICON DevOps Services is rated 0.0. On the other hand, coMakeIT Agile Development Services is most compared with , whereas ICON DevOps Services is most compared with .

See our list of best Agile and DevOps Services vendors.

We monitor all Agile and DevOps Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.