BMC Compuware Strobe vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BMC Compuware Strobe and OpenText Business Process Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The initial setup was fairly easy."

More BMC Compuware Strobe Pros →

"The stability has been very good over the years.""Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Pros →

Cons
"There are certain aspects of the configuration that could be simplified a bit."

More BMC Compuware Strobe Cons →

"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less.""The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Cons →

Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:Synthetic Monitoring is a very good capability as we can simulate the end-user interaction with the application and proactively we can discover issues before the real end users are impacted.
Top Answer:Here are some ways that Micro Focus APM (RUM and BPM) can help you identify the root cause of application issues Real User Monitoring (RUM) collects data from real users as they interact with… more »
Ranking
Views
339
Comparisons
236
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
468
Comparisons
379
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor
Learn More
Overview

Compuware Strobe is the industry-leading mainframe application performance management and analysis solution for mainframe applications. With Strobe, IT departments can pinpoint application inefficiencies that cause excessive CPU consumption, elongated elapsed times and reduce hardware and software costs while increasing customer satisfaction.

With Strobe, mainframe teams can:

  • Locate and improve resource-consumptive database calls
  • Identify tuning opportunities to reduce monthly software licensing costs (MLC)
  • Resolve performance issues before they impact application service levels
  • Apply analytics to captured data to produce reports showing high-resource consumption and applications that need tuning
  • Measure activity of both online and batch-processing applications in single and multiple- system environments
  • Identify several I/O problems, including inefficient VSAM file buffering
  • Create and schedule automatic, reusable measurements
  • Automatically detect performance problems by using a rolling average of CPU consumption and elapsed-time metrics

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is an Application monitoring software.

Proactively and consistently monitor business processes to identify performance issues before they affect users.

Review affected service level agreements.

BPM provides consistent, predictable measurements that help you associate the business impact with its root cause.

Sample Customers
Chunghwa Telecom, Helvetia, Comerica Bank, Erste Group, Bank of Ireland, Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company (SFBCIC)
United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm33%
Computer Software Company13%
Manufacturing Company12%
Insurance Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Manufacturing Company16%
Computer Software Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
Wholesaler/Distributor9%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise82%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise66%
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BMC Compuware Strobe is ranked 62nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is ranked 58th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. BMC Compuware Strobe is rated 8.0, while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of BMC Compuware Strobe writes "Stable with a good database and a good interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Process Monitoring writes "Stable with good performance visibility but is a discontinued product". BMC Compuware Strobe is most compared with IBM Application Performance Analyzer for zOS, IBM Application Performance Management and Mainframe Application Tuner, whereas OpenText Business Process Monitoring is most compared with AppDynamics and Dynatrace.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.