We performed a comparison between Concourse for VMware Tanzu and IBM Rational Build Forge based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation."We never experienced any problems with scalability."
"All features are useful. Our customer doesn't have any complaints about the tool. It works pretty well for what they want and what they need to do."
"Very good reporting features."
"I would like to see additional support for things outside of Cloud Foundry."
"Not user friendly for the layman."
"Its logging can be improved. When something goes wrong, it is not always very easy to find the problem. It is hard to identify whether the problem is because of low memory in the server or some configuration in Rational Build Forge. The error logs are not very detailed, and they should provide more information. It should also have more integration with third-party tools. It would be great to have more integration with third-party tools."
Earn 20 points
Concourse for VMware Tanzu is ranked 14th in Build Automation with 1 review while IBM Rational Build Forge is ranked 19th in Build Automation. Concourse for VMware Tanzu is rated 7.0, while IBM Rational Build Forge is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Concourse for VMware Tanzu writes "This solution is scalable and stable, but needs more support for deployments outside of Cloud Foundry". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational Build Forge writes "Great reporting features and very functional". Concourse for VMware Tanzu is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, TeamCity, Bamboo and GitLab, whereas IBM Rational Build Forge is most compared with Jenkins, Bamboo and Digital.ai Release .
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.