• Home
  • Cormant-CS DCIM vs. FieldView

Cormant-CS DCIM vs FieldView comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cormant Logo

Cormant-CS DCIM

50 views|27 comparisons
FieldView Solutions Logo

FieldView

36 views|22 comparisons
Ranking
22nd
out of 25 in Data Center Infrastructure Management
Views
50
Comparisons
27
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
24th
out of 25 in Data Center Infrastructure Management
Views
36
Comparisons
22
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Cormant
Video Not Available
FieldView Solutions
Video Not Available
Overview

Cormant-CS is a complete DCIM solution that delivers unmatched functionality, intuitive ease of use, and rapid return on investment.

  • First DCIM solution delivering success to customers for over 12 years.
  • Over 250 customers on 6 continents.
  • Over 1,000,000 assets under management.
  • Used by customers ranging from small, single site data centers, to global financial institutions with hundreds of sites across the globe.
  • Unmatched ROI and deployment speed.
  • Founder-led company with a strong dedication to customer success.
Information Not Available
Sample Customers
InteropNet, Melbourne Airport, Australian Telco, Carleton University, Penrith City Council, McKesson Corporation
AIT, Capitol Power, Chapman Company, DataCritical, E&I, FAS, JPT Global, Ramtek, Seenco Group

Cormant-CS DCIM is ranked 22nd in Data Center Infrastructure Management while FieldView is ranked 24th in Data Center Infrastructure Management. Cormant-CS DCIM is rated 0.0, while FieldView is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Cormant-CS DCIM is most compared with , whereas FieldView is most compared with .

See our list of best Data Center Infrastructure Management vendors.

We monitor all Data Center Infrastructure Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.