Compare Cprime DevOps vs. ICON SAFe Transformations

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
22nd
out of 30 in Agile and DevOps Services
Views
4
Comparisons
2
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
10th
out of 30 in Agile and DevOps Services
Views
8
Comparisons
4
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
+ Add more products to compare
+ Add more products to compare
Also Known As
ICON Scaled Agile Framework Transformations
Learn
Cprime
ICON Agility
Video Not Available
Overview

We believe in the power of the Agile process and have a proven track record for success on both small and large scale engagements. We take a comprehensive approach to all Agile engagements, looking at both Agile process and technology to provide the right services for immediate results and scaling in the future.

Why is a SAFe Gold SPCT Partner essential for your Transformation?

Demonstrated ability to lead organizations through SAFe adoptions and implementations
Expertise in all 7 Business Agility Competencies in SAFe 5.0
Certified to teach the entire SAFe curriculum
Critical experience for Large Solutions between 50 and thousands of people
Access to Certified SAFe Program Consultant Trainers (SPCTs), the leading thinkers and teachers within SAFe

Offer
Learn more about Cprime DevOps
Learn More
Learn more about ICON SAFe Transformations
Learn More

Cprime DevOps is ranked 22nd in Agile and DevOps Services while ICON SAFe Transformations is ranked 10th in Agile and DevOps Services. Cprime DevOps is rated 0.0, while ICON SAFe Transformations is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Cprime DevOps is most compared with , whereas ICON SAFe Transformations is most compared with .

See our list of best Agile and DevOps Services vendors.

We monitor all Agile and DevOps Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.