Cubic Telecom Platform vs OpenText IoT Platform comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
13th
out of 33 in IoT Platforms
Views
216
Comparisons
88
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
21st
out of 33 in IoT Platforms
Views
82
Comparisons
45
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Founded in 2009, Cubic Telecom has grown to become one of the leading technology enablers to automotive OEMs , mobile device companies, and pioneering IoT players across the globe. An expert in connectivity management, Cubic Telecom’s proven software platform PACE, empowers its partners to deliver industry-defining new services in areas like content management, location-based services, subscription management, and entertainment. Based in Dublin, Ireland, Cubic Telecom is privately held with over €110 million in funding by Audi Electronics Venture GmbH, Qualcomm, Valid, Enterprise Ireland, The European Investment Bank, the Ireland Strategic Investment Fund and ACT Venture Capital among others

The OpenText IoT Platform provides an identity-centric approach to managing day to day operations of industrial assets and connected things. ... Transforms the operation of downstream business systems and improves customer engagement, using lifecycle data obtained from industrial assets.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
The Auto Club Group (ACG), SITE Centers, Hospital system, Temperzone Australia

Cubic Telecom Platform is ranked 13th in IoT Platforms while OpenText IoT Platform is ranked 21st in IoT Platforms. Cubic Telecom Platform is rated 0.0, while OpenText IoT Platform is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Cubic Telecom Platform is most compared with Jasper Platform, whereas OpenText IoT Platform is most compared with .

See our list of best IoT Platforms vendors.

We monitor all IoT Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.