• Home
  • Datablink Device 200 vs. Gemalto Protiva

Datablink Device 200 vs Gemalto Protiva comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Datablink Logo

Datablink Device 200

69 views|57 comparisons
Thales Cloud Security Logo

Gemalto Protiva

Read 2 Gemalto Protiva reviews
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Datablink Device 200 and Gemalto Protiva based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Datablink Device 200?
Paul Connaire
A cost-effective solution, but the user interface lacks the ability to customize
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "This is a cost-effective solution compared to some other products out there."

    • More Gemalto Protiva Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    53rd
    out of 105 in Authentication Systems
    Views
    69
    Comparisons
    57
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In Authentication Systems
    Buyer's Guide
    Authentication Systems
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Protiva
    Learn More
    Datablink
    Video Not Available
    Thales Cloud Security
    Overview

    Datablink Device 200 offers significantly enhanced security compared to traditional tokens. Through patented technology, Datablink Device 200 creates a secure channel with the backend of the financial institution. It enables advanced authentication and financial transaction signing by reading a blinking image and generating a one-time use challenge and response-based dynamic password or signature. Unlike competitive solutions, Datablink Device 200 is a truly intuitive solution that offers unmatched ease of use with its unique screen reading technology.

    Protiva is a strong authentication platform that was developed to incorporate the strengths of Gemalto's smart card technology. It consists of a family of smart card-based user authentication devices, a browser plug-in, an authentication and customer care server and a self-service user care portal.
    Sample Customers
    Mizuho, Banco Paulista, BTGPactual, Cetip, Telefonica, FIS, TOTVS, ICBC, Azul, Sicob, Unimed, Ype, Digitro, Brinks, Martins, Sicredi
    Exostar, Sunrise Health Region, Baker Tilly, Seattle Children's, SEW-Eurodrive
    Buyer's Guide
    Authentication Systems
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Datablink Device 200 is ranked 53rd in Authentication Systems while Gemalto Protiva doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems. Datablink Device 200 is rated 0.0, while Gemalto Protiva is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Gemalto Protiva writes "Strong authentication permits our organization to improve security". Datablink Device 200 is most compared with Swivel Secure PINsafe, whereas Gemalto Protiva is most compared with .

    See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

    We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.