Datablink Device 200 vs Venafi comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Datablink Logo
69 views|58 comparisons
Venafi Logo
705 views|398 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Datablink Device 200 and Venafi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Datablink Device 200?
Yasiru Probo
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:We use Venafi for PKI certificates.
Top Answer:Venafi's overall installation could be made easier. You have to install the client, then go to the console and push the certificate.
Top Answer:Venafi has some additional functionalities for managing PKI certificates compared to other certificate deployment products. I would recommend Venafi to other users. Overall, I rate Venafi an eight out… more »
Ranking
51st
Views
69
Comparisons
58
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
17th
Views
705
Comparisons
398
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
301
Rating
8.5
Comparisons
Learn More
Datablink
Video Not Available
Overview

Datablink Device 200 offers significantly enhanced security compared to traditional tokens. Through patented technology, Datablink Device 200 creates a secure channel with the backend of the financial institution. It enables advanced authentication and financial transaction signing by reading a blinking image and generating a one-time use challenge and response-based dynamic password or signature. Unlike competitive solutions, Datablink Device 200 is a truly intuitive solution that offers unmatched ease of use with its unique screen reading technology.

Venafi automates protection for machine identities, which all organizations rely on to keep communications between machines secure and private. Venafi generates the machine identity intelligence necessary to automatically safeguard the flow of information to trusted machines and prevent communication with untrusted ones - all at machine speed and scale.
Sample Customers
Mizuho, Banco Paulista, BTGPactual, Cetip, Telefonica, FIS, TOTVS, ICBC, Azul, Sicob, Unimed, Ype, Digitro, Brinks, Martins, Sicredi
Surescripts, CME Group, TD Bank Group, Aetna, MoneyGram, Zions Bancorp, Cisco
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm21%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Manufacturing Company9%
Government7%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise74%
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
770,292 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Datablink Device 200 is ranked 51st in Authentication Systems while Venafi is ranked 17th in Authentication Systems with 3 reviews. Datablink Device 200 is rated 0.0, while Venafi is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Venafi writes "The solution has some additional functionalities for managing PKI certificates compared to other products". Datablink Device 200 is most compared with , whereas Venafi is most compared with DigiCert PKI Platform, AppViewX CERT+ and Entrust Identity Enterprise.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.