• Home
  • Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] vs. In-Webo

Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] vs In-Webo comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Datablink Logo

Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL]

views| comparisons
In-Webo Logo

In-Webo

159 views|140 comparisons
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] and In-Webo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Unranked
In Authentication Systems
33rd
out of 105 in Authentication Systems
Views
159
Comparisons
140
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Datablink
Video Not Available
In-Webo
Video Not Available
Overview

Datablink Mobile 200 offers advanced authentication and financial transactions signing for organizations and their customers. It enables advanced authentication and financial transaction signing. Rather than requiring a user to physically type a code into a device to generate a one-time password, users simply use their smartphone to confirm their identities. No other devices are required. To verify a user's identity or sign a specific transaction, the organization can choose to employ push technology or use a QR Code that is read by the user's smartphone camera. 

inWebo took a different approach that prevents all 3 common 'flaws' of software+SaaS MFA solutions. We built our authentication algorithms using dynamic and random device credentials. The verification algorithms run within certified HSMs (hardware-security modules) operated in our multi-datacenter infrastructure. From a security standpoint, our solution is equivalent if not better than those 10 years ago. Yet, it also enjoys the flexibility, scalability, and convenience of a software+SaaS solution.
Sample Customers
Mizuho, Banco Paulista, BTGPactual, Cetip, Telefonica, FIS, TOTVS, ICBC, Azul, Sicob, Unimed, Ype, Digitro, Brinks, Martins, Sicredi
Deloitte, Groupama, Carrefour, Renater, Accor, Samsung, Sodexo, Pixia, Affirm, Safran, Locarchives
Buyer's Guide
Authentication Systems
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems while In-Webo is ranked 33rd in Authentication Systems. Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] is rated 0.0, while In-Webo is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Datablink Mobile 200 [EOL] is most compared with , whereas In-Webo is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.