• Home
  • Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs. DeepSurface

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs DeepSurface comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and DeepSurface based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
AshishPaliwal
Offers contextual prioritization and risk-based remediation of vulnerability
Use DeepSurface?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think the pricing is based on the number of endpoints, so it's more subscription-based."

    • More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Kenna.VM?
    Top Answer:The risk context of any vulnerability is a valuable feature.
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kenna.VM?
    Top Answer:I think the pricing is based on the number of endpoints, so it's more subscription-based. If you have 10 computers versus a million computers, obviously the pricing will change.
    What needs improvement with Kenna.VM?
    Top Answer:An improvement would be some sort of an integration with any GRC suite. There are a lot of GRC suites available, like Archer, MetricStream, Rsam, Protiviti, for example. So how would a solution like… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    10th
    out of 37 in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
    Views
    684
    Comparisons
    473
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    498
    Rating
    8.0
    60th
    out of 110 in Vulnerability Management
    Views
    74
    Comparisons
    49
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Kenna.VM, Kenna Security, Kenna, Kenna Security Platform
    Learn More
    Cisco
    DeepSurface
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Cisco Vulnerability Management equips you with the contextual insight and threat intelligence needed to intercept the next exploit and respond with precision.

    Prioritization is no longer a dark art—it's data science. Advanced algorithms, combined with rich internal and external intel, offer recommended fixes that will lower risk in as few moves as possible.

    Track vulnerability fluctuations and forecast weaponization with up to 94% accuracy, giving you the chance to remediate high-risk vulnerabilities before bad actors can mount an attack.

    With more than 19 threat intelligence feeds at your fingertips, you gain a comprehensive view of emerging threats, shifting trends, and your own risk profile.

    A single source of data-verified truth aligns security and IT, eliminating friction and freeing up resources. And intuitive, simplified risk scores help you generate reports anyone can understand.

    DeepSurface Security is the first automated Predictive Vulnerability Management suite of tools that helps cybersecurity teams automate the process of analyzing and prioritizing vulnerabilities on enterprise networks. Created by a veteran cybersecurity team, DeepSurface Security is trusted by enterprise companies to identify, prioritize, and research vulnerabilities in their networks.

    Sample Customers
    TransUnion
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Insurance Company7%
    Retailer7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise67%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is ranked 10th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while DeepSurface is ranked 60th in Vulnerability Management. Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is rated 8.0, while DeepSurface is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) writes "Offers contextual prioritization and risk-based remediation of vulnerability". On the other hand, Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is most compared with Rapid7 InsightVM, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Ivanti Neurons for RBVM and Skybox Security Suite, whereas DeepSurface is most compared with .

    We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.