We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub and IBM InfoSphere MDM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, TIBCO, Reltio and others in Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions."The most valuable features of Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub are the ability to do data integrations, APM Management, MDM, and data catalog."
"The most valuable feature is that it's very easy to develop the processes and we have been using it for a long time. At that time, no other tool was available, and it was the best product. When we first got it, I don't think it was a Dell product back then. We upgraded to the cloud last year. Today, it's still the best because it's very user-friendly, and the user interface is also very user-friendly. We can easily develop the processes quickly."
"We use the administrator to create different interfaces. We developed APIs for specific applications like data validation between systems. We have our own product and base it on the Boomi interfaces that generate this type of data validation."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it seems to be more of a drag and drop interface."
"The features that are most valuable are the governance, the end-profiling and the ETL which allows you to see the metadata repositories."
"The advantage is that the matching engine is very good, so that's why customers generally prefer it. From the inbuilt data model perspective, IBM MDM is good."
"There are not really many areas of the product that need improvement because the product stays up-to-date with data management needs."
"When users update their information on one product, the data is sent to a database. My approach was to maintain a master data record, ensuring that each platform loads the latest updated record. Instead of having three separate records, the system keeps one master data record, storing the historical records for reference."
"We have problems in some scenarios where there are messages in the queue and would require some support."
"Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub could improve by having a ChatGPT AI tool to solve problems and develop quicker."
"The price could be better. It would also be better if they stopped changing the icons every six months. Whenever they change it, users have to adapt to them again."
"The reporting needs to be improved to help get more KPIs in the longterm. Now, the system keeps only three months."
"IBM InfoSphere MDM's UI is complicated. It also needs to improve its on-prem configuration."
"The tool is difficult to understand from a customer perspective and for developers."
"The product is really only created for large organizations."
"We also want better cloud integration, so we could do things in the cloud if we needed to. This would be a good feature to add in a future release."
More Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub Pricing and Cost Advice →
Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub is ranked 7th in Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions with 5 reviews while IBM InfoSphere MDM is ranked 4th in Master Data Management (MDM) Software with 9 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub is rated 7.8, while IBM InfoSphere MDM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub writes "A user-friendly cloud-native master data management platform that enables rapid process development". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere MDM writes "Provides inbuilt data model and good matching engine". Boomi AtomSphere Master Data Hub is most compared with Informatica MDM, SAP Master Data Governance, Informatica PIM, Microsoft MDS and Semarchy xDM, whereas IBM InfoSphere MDM is most compared with Informatica MDM, IBM Master Data Management on Cloud, SAP Master Data Governance, TIBCO EBX and Microsoft MDS.
We monitor all Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
