Compare DNIF vs. Microsoft ATA [EOL]

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
DNIF Logo
Read 2 DNIF reviews.
2,141 views|1,446 comparisons
Microsoft ATA [EOL] Logo
3,558 views|2,073 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Securonix Solutions, Splunk, One Identity and others in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: November 2020.
447,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The response time on queries is super-fast.""The User Behavior Analytics is a built-in threat-hunting feature. It detects and reports on any kind of malware or ransomware that enters the network.""The solution is quite stable and offers good performance. It also works on a virtual machine. We haven't found any issues with it so far. It's been reliable."

More DNIF Pros »

"One of the most valuable features is the ability to report on questionable activity.""The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions.""The stability of the solution is very good."

More Microsoft ATA [EOL] Pros »

Cons
"The solution should be able to connect to endpoints, such as desktops and laptops... If this solution had a smart connector to these logs- Windows, Linux, or any other logs - without affecting the performance of the connector, that would be wonderful.""The vendor is fairly new and it's not as big as some of the international competitors. It's not a mature product. If you ask them to move data, it might take a lot of time."

More DNIF Cons »

"Some of the newer features are not completely there yet... For example, there's a tool that allows you to grade your overall internal security and I don't feel that it's completely accurate.""It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations. For example, if I were to set a rule that is a deviation from the pre-defined rules in the Microsoft product, there's conflict.""There are occasions where it generates some false positives and you have to embark into figuring it out. You need to find out if it was a true alert or a false positive. It's a little bit cumbersome in that area."

More Microsoft ATA [EOL] Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The pricing is based on the log size."

More DNIF Pricing and Cost Advice »

"I believe we are looking into new licenses. They may be called the E5. Honestly, I don't have it on top of my mind, but I think it's around seven to $10 a user per month."

More Microsoft ATA [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Behavior Analytics - UEBA solutions are best for your needs.
447,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution is quite stable and offers good performance. It also works on a virtual machine. We haven't found any issues with it so far. It's been reliable.
Top Answer: The vendor is fairly new and it's not as big as some of the international competitors. It's not a mature product. If you ask them to move data, it might take a lot of time. There needs to be more… more »
Top Answer: We have integrated all our network devices, our servers, and our applications as well as some customized applications. We use the solution to collect the logs. We track items such as unsuccessful… more »
Top Answer: The solution works well when used with other Microsoft solutions.
Top Answer: The software is not as advanced as many competitors. It doesn't offer the level of granularity that other software might. It would be ideal if the interface allowed for more granular configurations… more »
Top Answer: The solution is primarily used by my clients in order to combine security software.
Ranking
Views
2,141
Comparisons
1,446
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
990
Avg. Rating
7.0
Views
3,558
Comparisons
2,073
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
573
Avg. Rating
6.5
Popular Comparisons
Compared 36% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics
Learn
NETMONASTERY
Microsoft
Overview

DNIF offers solutions to the world’s most challenging cybersecurity problems. Recognized by Gartner and used by some of the well-known global companies like PwC, Vodafone and Tata, this next generation analytics platform combines Security and Big Data Analytics to provide real-time threat detection and analytics to the most critical data assets on the Internet. With over a decade of experience in threat detection systems, DNIF has one of the fastest query response times and bridges the gap between searching, processing, analyzing and visualizing data thereby enabling companies with better SOC (Security Operations Center) management.

Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics (ATA) provides a simple and fast way to understand what is happening within your network by identifying suspicious user and device activity with built-in intelligence and providing clear and relevant threat information on a simple attack timeline. Microsoft ATA is an on-premises platform to help you protect your enterprise from advanced targeted attacks by automatically analyzing, learning, and identifying normal and abnormal entity (user, devices, and resources) behavior. It detects suspicious activities and malicious attacks with behavioral analytics, adapts to the changing nature of cyber-security threats, focuses on what is important with a simple attack timeline and reduces false positive fatigue.
Offer
Learn more about DNIF
Learn more about Microsoft ATA [EOL]
Sample Customers
Vodafone India, IDEA Cellular, RBL Bank, NCDEX, NSETurkish Airlines, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Empa, The Alberta Teachers' Association
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider36%
Computer Software Company31%
Media Company8%
Financial Services Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government11%
Manufacturing Company7%
Find out what your peers are saying about Securonix Solutions, Splunk, One Identity and others in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA. Updated: November 2020.
447,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.

DNIF is ranked 11th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 2 reviews while Microsoft ATA [EOL] is ranked 8th in User Behavior Analytics - UEBA with 3 reviews. DNIF is rated 7.0, while Microsoft ATA [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of DNIF writes "Powerful analytics and machine-learning enable us to find attack patterns". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft ATA [EOL] writes "Good integration, simple to maintain, and very stable". DNIF is most compared with Splunk, IBM QRadar, ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM), LogRhythm NextGen SIEM and ELK Logstash, whereas Microsoft ATA [EOL] is most compared with Splunk User Behavior Analytics, Varonis Datalert, Securonix UEBA, Rapid7 InsightIDR and Exabeam.

See our list of best User Behavior Analytics - UEBA vendors.

We monitor all User Behavior Analytics - UEBA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.