We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management."Dome9 continues to be a major piece of our cloud security architecture and has given our senior leadership team a high degree of confidence in our ability to protect our cloud environment."
"The most valuable feature of Check Point CloudGuard Posture Management is the training."
"It offers advanced detection of threats that can harm data from the cloud database."
"We can monitor each activity from our mobile devices, so there is complete visibility of our cloud traffic flows, with threat intelligence provided by Check Point."
"The automatic learning and an AI engine help to find more modern vulnerability problems."
"Overall, it provides good security."
"The ability to drill down to individual hosts on an account and see which ones are affected is valuable."
"The various CNAPP modules have granted more visibility of our cloud applications to our system engineers and developers."
"Qualys VM has allowed us to know the vulnerabilities we need to prioritize based on the threat levels and the possible impact if there's an intrusion."
"Detects new hosts along with vulnerabilities."
"I like Qualys because it is a very complete product, more so than Tenable."
"It is a stable solution."
"The biggest benefit is from a security operations perspective, where we are able to drive our security posture upwards by remediating any discovered vulnerabilities."
"Monitors workstations and servers for vulnerabilities and creates reports."
"The most valuable features are vulnerability detection and the scanning capability to enable identification of vulnerabilities across our network."
"The most valuable feature is that this solution is very lightweight."
"Dome9 should also support deployments that are on-premises and in a hybrid cloud."
"We have concerns regarding the pricing and would appreciate seeing some improvements."
"They take time to respond or coordinate a meeting since they maintain a schedule that does not fit Latin America very well."
"Reporting should have more options."
"CloudGuard CNAPP could be enhanced by increasing the number of components that run natively on Azure."
"It should have some options to activate API calls to the platform in the cloud, another improvement would be that when the rules are colonized and they want to be published."
"The reporting has a lot of opportunities to continuously improve so that we can continue to show value."
"I am not a technical person, but generically, the user interface can be a little more intuitive. Our staff has trained network security and cloud security professionals, and they get it, but when you are trying to get to the customers to be able to pick it up and maintain it, it can be a bit difficult."
"Qualys VM could improve by having more skilled support personnel."
"They're still evolving their platform in terms of reporting capabilities."
"Integration could be better. When you think about scanning, it's not used just with this product alone but with other Qualys products. If you think about the bundle, the product itself is good. But integration with other products and packages has space for improvement. They should also offer a better price for bundles."
"It's not very user-friendly at times and requires in-depth understanding. So, a layman or someone new to Qualys won't be able to easily understand it. You need education to use the solution."
"The price could be better. Asset view is still a legacy feature. I'm not able to extract the information about the asset with complete details. It would be better if they fixed that in the next release. I know Qualys is already working on it, so I'm hopeful it will be available in the next five or six months. That would be something that's changed where I seek improvement."
"Qualys should improve their customer experience. They need to improve the tech support experience and the turnaround time."
"I would like to see this solution simplified to work more easily in a multi-cloud environment."
"I would like to see this solution more developed and competitive in the Cloud space."
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is ranked 5th in Vulnerability Management with 60 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 3rd in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 77 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is rated 8.6, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP writes "Threat intel integration provides us visibility in case any workload is communicating with suspicious or blacklisted IPs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP is most compared with Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, AWS GuardDuty, Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
