Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
People implementing this solution are concerned with addressing a significant risk, and within the AWS realm, this tool does de-risk substantially.
Dome9 has improved our organization; we have a centralized view of all of our assets, our visible assets our ECs, our inventories. And then all the policies are centralized, and it is easier to manage because everything is one component console.
Dome9 wraps our FTP infrastructure with its network security configurations, and this also gives us the ability to monitor FTP activity.
Gives us centralized firewall management for both Windows and Linux distros. Also provides a clear view of the security configurations and connections across environments (DMZ, external and internal networks).
The user interface is responsive and quite intuitive; when selecting an object it automatically shows the relevant actions.
Dome9 continues to be a major piece of our cloud security architecture and has given our senior leadership team a high degree of confidence in our ability to protect our cloud environment.
We have more visibility than ever before, appreciating the valuable and proactive insight that we receive from the platform.
The Compliance engine has helped put our auditors and senior executives at ease, as we can quickly and accurately measure ourselves against hundreds of compliance checks to include CIS benchmarks, PCI, and other best practices.
The most valuable feature is the SecOps because they have our back and they help us with the reports... It's like having an extension of your team. And then, it grows with you.
The number-one feature is the monitoring of interactive sessions on our Linux machines. We run an immutable environment, so that nothing is allowed to be changed in production... We're constantly monitoring to make sure that no one is violating that. Threat Stack is what allows us to do that.
Every other security tool we've looked is good at containers, or at Kubernetes, is good at AWS, or at instance monitoring. But nobody is good at tying all of those things together, and that's really where Threat Stack shines.
There has been a measurable decrease in the meantime to remediation... because we have so many different tech verticals already collated in one place, our ability to respond is drastically different than it used to be.
It has been quite helpful to have the daily alerts coming to my email, as well as the Sev 1 Alerts... We just went through a SOX audit and those were pivotal.
We're using it on container to see when activity involving executables happens, and that's great.
We like the ability of the host security module to monitor the processes running on our servers to help us monitor activity.
The rules are really great. They give us more visibility and control over what's being triggered. There's a large set of rules that come out-of-the-box. We can customize them and we can create our own rules based on the traffic patterns that we see.
I would like to see some AI on the back-end, just to assist with doing analysis and making recommendations.
I would like to see Test B functions at the application access level.
I’d like to see more integration with third-party tools. For example, it would be helpful to have an integration between Dome9 and ServiceNow to manage security incidents and security changes.
I would like to see tighter integration with other compliance tools, like Chef Compliance, in addition to Inspector.
They could give a few more insights into security groups and recommendations on how to be more effective. That's getting more into the AWS environment, specifically. I'm not sure if that's Threat Stack's plan or not, but I would like them to help us be efficient about how we're setting up security groups. They could recommend separation of VPCs and the like - really dig into our architecture. I haven't seen a whole lot of that and I think that's something that, right off the bat, could have made us smarter.
The API - which has grown quite a bit, so we're still learning it and I can't say whether it still needs improvement - was an area that had been needing it.
The solution’s ability to consume alerts and data in third-party tools (via APIs and export into S3 buckets) is moderate. They have some work to do in that area... The API does not mimic the features of the UI as far as reporting and pulling data out go. There's a big discrepancy there.
The one thing that we know they're working on, but we don't have through the tool, is the application layer. As we move to a serverless environment, with AWS Fargate or direct Lambda, that's where Threat Stack does not have the capacity to provide feed. Those are areas that it's blind to now...
The user interface can be a little bit clunky at times... There's a lot of information that needs to be waded through, and the UI just isn't great.
The reports aren't very good. We've automated the report generation via the API and replaced almost all the reports that they generate for us using API calls instead.
I would like further support of Windows endpoint agents or the introduction of support for Windows endpoint agents.
Some features do not work as expected.
Pricing and Cost Advice
I would advise taking into account the existing number of devices and add a forecast of the number of devices to be added in the coming year or two, to obtain better pricing.
They support either annual licensing or hourly. At the time of our last negotiation, it was either one or the other, you could not mix or match. I would have liked to mix/match.
What we're paying now is somewhere around $15 to $20 per agent per month, if I recall correctly. The other cost we have is SecOps.
It came in cheaper than Trend Micro when we purchased it a few years ago.
It is very expensive compared to some other products. The pricing is definitely high.
Pricing seems to be in line with the market structure. It's fine.
I'm happy with the amount that we spend for the product that we get and the overall service that we get. It's not cheap, but I'm still happy with the spend.
We find the licensing and pricing very easy to understand and a good value for the services provided.
It is a cost-effective choice versus other solutions on the market.
out of 19 in Cloud Workload Security
Average Words per Review
out of 19 in Cloud Workload Security
Average Words per Review
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
|Check Point||Threat Stack|
CloudGuard Dome9 is a comprehensive software platform for public cloud security and compliance orchestration. Using Dome9, organizations can visualize and assess their security posture, detect misconfigurations, model and actively enforce security best practices, and protect against identity theft and data loss in the cloud. Dome9 delivers security capabilities across Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud Platform (GCP). Learn more about Cloud Security Orchestration (Dome9)
Threat Stack is purpose-built to support organizations running in the cloud and the unique requirements of a cloud-based or hybrid infrastructure. In order to protect your sensitive data (the crown jewels) you need to know who is doing what, where and when – at all times. With continuous cloudand up-to-the-second alerting, you’ll always have the complete visibility you need to detect anomalous activity and know what occurred immediately.
Learn more about Dome9
Learn more about Threat Stack
|Symantec, Citrix, Car and Driver, Virgin, Cloud Technology Partners||StatusPage.io, Walkbase, Spanning, DNAnexus, Jobcase, Nextcapital, Smartling, Veracode, 6sense|
Software R&D Company33%
Financial Services Firm11%
Comms Service Provider8%
No Data Available