Compare Drupal vs. dotCMS

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
dotCMS Logo
344 views|304 comparisons
Drupal Logo
5,389 views|4,426 comparisons
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Liferay, Oracle and others in Web Content Management. Updated: November 2020.
447,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"I would like to see better pricing."

More Drupal Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
447,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Web Content Management consists of the following: (1) Platform (2) Tools (3) Frameworks. In general, there are two types for each of the above. These are completely open-source free versions… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
23rd
Views
344
Comparisons
304
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
5th
Views
5,389
Comparisons
4,426
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
429
Avg. Rating
8.5
Popular Comparisons
Compared 41% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Learn
dotCMS
Drupal
Overview

dotCMS is a powerful content management system that simplifies the complex needs and integration requirements of large organizations. It delivers content to websites, intranets, mobile apps and anything with an internet connection. Teams can push entire websites to geographically distributed servers or CDNs. Fully customizable workflows adapt to your business needs. dotCMS easily integrates with third party systems, like marketing automation, eCommerce, CRMs and ERPs.

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications
Offer
Learn more about dotCMS
Learn more about Drupal
Sample Customers
Standard & Poor's, Roto-Rooter, Novartis, El Pollo Loco, Sépaq, Wawanesa Insurance, University of Akron, Ask.com, GreenSky, Ipsy, Oberlin College, BNP Paribas, Honda, Fairfax Digital, Aquent, Thomson Reuters Foundation, Nomura, Equinix, S&P Global, viaprintoBMJ, The Economist, New Republic, SpaceX, Lush, Danone, Tesla Motors, Peugeot, Stanford Law, Harvard, Oxford University, MIT Media Lab, The Beatles, MTV UK, The Weather Channel, NBC, BBC, grammy.com, Mus_e du Louvre, Whitehouse.gov, London.gov.uk, Gouvernment.fr, New Zealand Government, The Prince of Wales, British Council, NYC Metropolitan Transport Authority, Gatwick Obviously
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Marketing Services Firm20%
Media Company20%
Non Profit20%
Retailer10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider15%
Media Company7%
K 12 Educational Company Or School7%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise28%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Liferay, Oracle and others in Web Content Management. Updated: November 2020.
447,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.

dotCMS is ranked 23rd in Web Content Management while Drupal is ranked 5th in Web Content Management with 2 reviews. dotCMS is rated 0.0, while Drupal is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Drupal writes "A good product that helps me to manage complex digital solutions". dotCMS is most compared with WordPress, Liferay Digital Experience Platform and Magnolia CMS, whereas Drupal is most compared with SharePoint, Liferay Digital Experience Platform, Atlassian Confluence, Adobe Experience Manager and eZ Systems eZ Publish.

See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.