Dotcom-Monitor UserView Monitoring vs Nastel AutoPilot comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Dotcom-Monitor UserView Monitoring and Nastel AutoPilot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Dotcom-Monitor UserView Monitoring?
Anonymous User
Ranking
Views
175
Comparisons
145
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
173
Comparisons
122
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
UserView Monitoring
Learn More
Overview
Monitor complex transactions on your website with real browsers. Record a user session interacting with a website. Monitor the functionality and performance of website features such as logins, shopping carts, searches and more. Interact with complex Rich Internet Applications (RIA) such as Flash, Silverlight and AJAX. If you can perform the action using a desktop or mobile browser, you can monitor the actions with UserView.
Nastel AutoPilot is an Application Performance Monitoring solution. It's real-time monitoring and analysis reduces the frequency and duration of incidents, end-to-end from distributed to mainframe.
Sample Customers
American InterContinental University, UMASS, ITT Technical Institute, Roanoke College, Trinity International University
Banamex, Barclays Capital, Bank of Bermuda, California Commerce Bank, Calyon Corporate and Investment Bank, CGEY, Checkfree Corporation, CIBC, CitiCard, Citicorp, New York, Citigroup Inc., CME Group Inc., Credit Agricole Indosuez Luxembourg, Credit Suisse, CRIF, Deutsche Bundesbank, Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein, DTCC, FannieMae, Fidelity (FMR), First Citizens Bank & Trust, Fortis Investments, GE Money Americas, GE Money Bank, HP, HP/WestLB Systems, HSBC, HSH Nordbank, IG Index, i-bp Banque, Populaire, Interpay Nederland B.V., IZB - Informatikzentrum Bayern GmbH & Co., JP Morgan, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., MGIC (Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation) NYSE, OMGEO, People's Bank (Ct), Peoples United Bank, Phoenix Informatica Bancaria S.p.A., PinkRoccade, Santander Bank, SKOFIN, Sociale Verzekeringsbank, Thomson Financial, UBS, UMB Financial Corporation
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Dotcom-Monitor UserView Monitoring is ranked 73rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Nastel AutoPilot is ranked 79th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Dotcom-Monitor UserView Monitoring is rated 0.0, while Nastel AutoPilot is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nastel AutoPilot writes "You can easily scale it for high message rates, but it's primarily a flow-monitoring tool rather than an APM". Dotcom-Monitor UserView Monitoring is most compared with , whereas Nastel AutoPilot is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.