• Home
  • ECI Mercury [EOL] vs. Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL]

ECI Mercury [EOL] vs Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Network Virtualization
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ECI Mercury [EOL] and Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Array Networks and others in Network Virtualization.
To learn more, read our detailed Network Virtualization Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use ECI Mercury [EOL]?
Anonymous User
We were able to reduce a lot of hardware calls where we used to have load generators.
We are able to use real-world scenarios from the global libraries with Network Virtualization pool support. It goes through about 1.3 billion... Read more →
Ranking
Unranked
In Network Virtualization
Unranked
In Network Virtualization
Buyer's Guide
Network Virtualization
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Array Networks and others in Network Virtualization. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
ECI Mercury NFV, ECI Mercury Network Functions Virtualization
Shunra, HPE Network Virtualization
Learn More
Ribbon Communications
OpenText
Overview

Providing end-users with the best low-latency experience, Mercury excels at deploying virtualized network functions at the mobile edge, at the customer premises, and in the network as an edge cloud. Mercury NFV platforms ensure that your network is always ready to respond quickly to new customer service opportunities.

Micro Focus Network Virtualization (NV) software enables you to capture and emulate real-world network conditions, so you can use real production data into your performance testing, and along with its powerful NV Analytics, it allows you to quickly detect and resolve performance bottlenecks before deployment. Or simply said, NV empowers you to release high quality apps by accurately testing and optimizing them for all network conditions. First, NV will discover and capture live network performance conditions, such as latency, packet loss, bandwidth and jitter and then it will test the application against the captured conditions to see how various networks affect the application's performance. Then NV will analyze results and gain insight into the root cause of the performance bottlenecks to ensure that the rolled out application is optimized for target network performance.

Buyer's Guide
Network Virtualization
March 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, VMware, Array Networks and others in Network Virtualization. Updated: March 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

ECI Mercury [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Virtualization while Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Virtualization. ECI Mercury [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL] is rated 7.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL] writes "We were able to reduce a lot of hardware calls where we used to have load generators". ECI Mercury [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Micro Focus Network Virtualization [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Network Virtualization vendors.

We monitor all Network Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.